News
Scientists endorse gene altered foods
Posted Saturday, November 22 2008 at 22:05
Scientists at the University of Nairobi on Saturday said it is safe to accept the introduction of genetically modified organisms into the country.
They also asked Parliament to quickly pass the highly controversial Biosafety Bill 2008, saying the technology will enhance food production and that they are ready to take responsibility for their advice.
At a conference after a two-day meeting on biotechnology at the university, scientists from the College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences said although there are genuine concerns over the technology, genetically modified organisms are safe enough for adoption so long as there is sound legislation in place.
“Just like a motor car is undoubtedly good technology, if it’s not used properly it can be harmful,” said Dr John Nderitu, the faculty dean.
He added that much of the opposition is not based on any sound science.
The researchers presented their statement along with other senior members of the faculty, all of them researchers in one aspect or the other of biotechnology.
Rejoinders
Their stand is bound to attract swift rejoinders from the civil society, which is opposed to the introduction of genetically modified organisms into the country.
“We have adequate human capacity in this country to offer tested evidence to policy makers as well as carry out the necessary research,” said Dr Nderitu.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is working with the faculty to put up a state of the art biotechnology laboratory at the university to enable their research.
-
Submitted by tarugeiPosted November 23, 2008 09:15 PM
-
Submitted by nani_ngombe
Ashtone: Why do you pose a narrow view on an issue of such magnitude? This is the last and final whip on the natural African seed bank. Monsanto patented drought resistant maize seeds come at a high cost for a farmer in Ukambani not to mention a myriad of health concerns. Some greedy American corporates think that they can firmly hang on Africa's navel by 'controlling' disease and food. Why wouldn't the same funds go towards upgrading local foods and setting up irrigation systems for subsistence farmers in the arid areas?
Posted November 23, 2008 08:59 PM -
Submitted by jogulla
mbiriri, you have no idea what you are talking about. Even if you were right, I would rather die of cancer at 55 than die with a big head, bulging eyes, an empty but protruding stomach at age 5, awaiting UN food from USA!
Posted November 23, 2008 05:20 PM -
Submitted by wavidani
The E.U., far more less greedy than the US and more caring for its citizens has rejected 90% of GM foods until more research is done.These scientists must be desperate for grants and are ready to use Kenyans as guinea pigs.No to GM foods.
Posted November 23, 2008 03:53 PM -
Submitted by AceChase
Over the same, they enforce asexual reproduction- how will all the sexual reproducing organisms procreate for a future? Unless we go the world of tissue culture, genetic apomixis is a must, and genetic mixing is Genetic engineering, and genetically modified organisms are just a hastened natural process. Where are the genetics scientists to point out the obvious to a world of uneducated who still imagine that technology is a threat to the future?
Posted November 23, 2008 02:59 PM
RSS
Imported food from the U.S is largely, genetically modified. Food that is send to impoverish African countries as Aid is produced using modern methods-genetic engineering-so as to increase yield,shelf life or improve taste.United States also exports it's GM food products( both plant and animal based)to almost every country in the world,so either way, you are already consuming GM foods.