News

Lawyers fault proposed tribunal on Waki

  Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating

A participant at a workshop on the proposed tribunal to try perpetrators of post election violence makes his contribution. Photo/ FAITH NJUGUNA. 

By OLIVER MATHENGE and SADIKI SUDHIR
Posted  Wednesday, December 3  2008 at  15:47

In Summary

  • Lawyers say document lacks capability to shield tribunal from political manipulation.
  • Draft unclear on the differentiation between international and ordinary crimes.

Lawyers have faulted a draft formulated for a tribunal to try suspects of post-election violence.

At the same time, two legislators revealed that there is intense lobbying in parliament to have the tribunal hurriedly formed.

The lawyers- both local and international- say the document lacks sufficient capability to shield the tribunal from political manipulation.

They said the new law was also in contradiction with sections of the constitution that allowed the president to pardon convicts and the attorney to terminate legal proceedings.

“The draft as published seems to be unclear in several aspects. For example, what danger is there in tabling the Bill before a political agreement has been signed?” ICTJ Prosecutions Director Marieke Wierda said.

Borrowing from lessons elsewhere in the world, two prosecution experts attached to the International Centre for Transitional Justice (ICTJ) advised the country to analysis the draft further.

ICTJ is an international organisation that assists countries pursuing accountability for past mass atrocity or human rights abuse.

The concerns were raised at a workshop on the proposed special tribunal by the International Center for Policy and Conflict.

Share This Story
Share

The workshop’s guest speaker Imenti Central MP Gitobu Imanyara noted that the implementation of the entire Waki report lacks political will.

He said the issue should remain an international affair since the formation of the Waki commission was an initiative of the African Union and backed by the United Nations.

“The Statute to be brought before parliament must address the weaknesses noted by the Waki report such as lack of sufficient evidence to try suspects internationally,” said Mr Imanyara.

He said that if the formation of the tribunal was left to politicians the country was likely to miss the opportunity of dealing with impunity.

Ndaragwa MP Jeremiah Kioni, who said that there was intense lobbying in parliament to hurriedly form the tribunal, also shared Mr Imanyara’s concerns.

He said some of those pushing for the fast formation of the tribunal were “those who have changed tune on the implementation of the Waki report in the last few weeks”.

“There are some MPs who do not to want the issue going to The Hague. They find the formation of a local tribunal as one of the ways that they can manipulate the process. We must be able to free the tribunal from political manipulation,” said Mr Kioni.

1 | 2 Next Page »

Add a comment (6 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by syindumyaki

    They will form the tribunal, its proceedings will drag on and on till 2012, by which time will be tired and bored to death about them, then we will have a new president who might have other ideas. Is there a way the victims of PEV can get monetary compensation as we prosecute these criminals? it could lessen the anger sweeping across the nation.

    Posted  December 04, 2008 12:31 PM  
  2. Submitted by stoo70

    There we go, thats the life in Kenya, playing around, i guess we should learn from Golden burg and Aglo leesing stories, its Kenyan way of life my dear friends!

    Posted  December 03, 2008 09:47 PM  
  3. Submitted by Newshawk

    Where do Kenyans get the idea from that tough legislation is what is required to tame impunity in this country? Who does not remember the tough no nonsense sexual offenses bill which became law several years ago? Tonight we saw a victim of rape on TV. The law has not stopped our women girls and even boys being raped. You can not legislate morals period! What we need in Kenya is a paradigm shift. Changing the way we think will definitely change the way we do business.

    Posted  December 03, 2008 08:54 PM  
  4. Submitted by Sam*D33

    If we are to assume that whether we us Hague or a local tribunal the results will be the same, then we had better use the Hague. This will save us a lot of lost time and other valuable resources. Two, they are the experts in trying such cases.Three, the degree of independence at the Hague is greater than the tribunal. Does the Hague charge to try cases? Is the cost more than justice the violence victims?

    Posted  December 03, 2008 07:19 PM  
  5. Submitted by muchori

    they will form the tribunal,prosecute the criminals,find them guilty and then the president will pardon them and life will go on,I have a strong feeling that this is the plan.

    Posted  December 03, 2008 07:11 PM  

See all 6 comments