News

President defends land lease

  Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating

The Tana Delta, where the government plans to lease 100,000 acres of land to Qatar to grow food crops. Photo/FILE 

By  GAKIHA WERU
Posted  Saturday, December 20  2008 at  21:45

In Summary

  • State House press chief says Kenya would immensely benefit from deal

President Mwai Kibaki on Saturday defended the government’s plan to lease 100,000 acres of the Tana Delta to Qatar, saying Kenya stands to benefit immensely from the possible Sh180 billion ($2.4 billion) deal.

The director of Presidential Press Service, Mr Isaiah Kabira, said the proposed project would open up vast areas of northern Kenya towards southern Sudan and Ethiopia.

Doha visit

The potential deal was discussed last month with Qatari officials when President Kibaki visited Doha for a development conference. It would see the Gulf state fund construction of a port in Lamu in exchange for use of the land.

“This is an integrated project which comprises highways, a railway line from Lamu through to Isiolo to Ethiopia and Sudan. This would serve as a new corridor to open up that part of the country for which we have never had a comprehensive plan,” Mr Kabira said in a telephone interview with the Sunday Nation.

Under the proposed agreement, details of which are being worked out, Qatar would help Kenya develop an equivalent number of acres for its own food security, he said.

“The area has great potential for vegetables and fruit. What the Qataris are saying is that they have the money and the market while we have the land,” Mr Kabira said.

He described the proposed arrangement as being of great strategic importance, particularly now that work is underway on a second port in Djibouti.

Share This Story
Share

“It is critical that we put up a new port with modern infrastructure because Djibouti will make Mombasa suddenly look very old. If we don’t position ourselves appropriately, we will lose out to Djibouti,” he said.

Promising that the government would make as much information as possible available to the public, Mr Kabira said the project is expected to take five years to complete.

The PPS boss clarified that the project is still in the formative formative stages and involves the Office of the President and the ministries of Finance and Foreign Affairs. He said other minstries like Transport and Ariculture would be brought on board should the project go forward.

Mr Kabira stressed that the project is still in the proposal stage, and the government can still look for another partner. “Our options are open, and if we are unable to to seal a deal with Qatar, we are free to look elsewhere.”

The area earmarked for the project is part of 1.3 million acres of uncultivated land owned by the government in the Tana River delta.

Proposed project

A proposed project in which Mumias would grow sugar cane and build a factory in the area has drawn controversy with environmentalists saying the project would destroy ecosytems. Pastoralists also claim the project would deny them access to grazing lands.

1 | 2 Next Page »

Add a comment (44 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by gracemutemi

    I actually think that if corruption doesn't interfere with this project, it will be very beneficial. But on the other hand, we need a comprehensive EIA report on the effects of the development project in the delta area, coz Tana River is our biggest river and supports socio-economic and cultural lives of Coastal communities. A cost benefit analysis would help us seperate fiction and facts. This is our land, i doubt any Arabic state would give us 1 acre to mine fuel for 1 year!

    Posted  March 13, 2009 02:37 PM  
  2. Submitted by parachuteband

    I think this a good deal. We get a port, highways, railways opening up northen kenya plus 100K acres developed for kenyan own food security and also transfer of technology. Kenyans, just know developing this infrastrure takes lots of money. If we reject this trust me 20 years from now we will have to ports ,railways etc and still suffering from same food shortages. Even if you subdivide the land to peasant farmers, they rudimentary methods of farming cannot remove them from poverty or save Kenya from food insecurity.

    Posted  December 22, 2008 11:31 AM  
  3. Submitted by Rito

    I support this. If we have been unable to use the said land to benefit ourselves for he last many years, we should let them lease it on condition that they also help us to achieve food security for our people. But the deal should be completely transparent so as not to bring any doubts and suspicions. I just hope no part of our coalition government will say this time round that it was not discussed by the cabinet. Or was it?

    Posted  December 22, 2008 10:41 AM  
  4. Submitted by joq

    it seems Kenya never learns it was only last year that we had organ donors televised all over the world… now we have been promised 180 billion to develop a colony within Kenya. While there is land less people running around with machetes during every elections. Prepare your children to learn a foreign language to get to heaven and remember that Kenya is secular.

    Posted  December 22, 2008 08:54 AM  
  5. Submitted by sammie75

    Kenyan citizens have an inherentproblem,they can't agree on issues affecting them,like land reforms,what worst,leasing the land,and reaping expected and obvious benefits?or killing,destroying and chasing others out of their farms.As we continue to dance in ignorance millons of gallon of water goes to waste,citizens stuff,unemployment songs...Already other multinational are there,Delmonte name them.When will we ever open our eyes.never as ignorance rules ,traditions and resistance to change will never help us as knowledge is a distance.

    Posted  December 22, 2008 06:34 AM  

See all 44 comments