News
Union vows strike action over plan to sell port
Posted Monday, October 26 2009 at 22:01
A meeting to discuss the privatisation of Mombasa port turned stormy when the giant Dockworkers’ Union rejected the plan on Monday.
Speakers who supported the privatisation of four berths at the port were heckled by the hostile union members and some had to walk out of the Bandari College amphitheatre in protest before the talks ended.
Not even pleas by the provincial commissioner, Mr Ernest Munyi, or the Kenya Ports Authority MD, Mr James Mulewa, could convince the rowdy union members to listen to presentations by members of the Privatisation Commission of Kenya.
However, the executive director of the commission, Mr Solomon Kitungu, later said that the privatisation of berths number 11 to 14 would go on despite the opposition.
During the meeting, the union secretary-general Simon Sang said members would go on strike next week if the government insists on privatising parts of the port.
“Let the government get us loud and clear: We don’t want privatisation of the port. Period,” he said.
According to him, in 2005, some Kenya Ports Authority senior managers crafted a privatisation plan under which 4,000 junior workers were targeted for sacking.
The plan also included leasing several assets and operations of the port to private firms with KPA operating only as a landlord. He asked the privatisation commission to justify how the country and wananchi would benefit from privatising the port.
When Mr Mulewa stood to respond to the issues, the unionists shouted him down. He then asked the PC, Mr Munyi, to speak, but the union members cut his speech short after he asked them to listen to the views of the commission.
In his presentation, Mr Kitungu had dismissed the union’s fears that the government wanted to privatise the entire port.
“What the government wants is only to improve infrastructure and service delivery by involving private capital and expertise,” he said.
He has maintained that unless the port operations were reformed, Kenya Ports Authority would be left behind in adopting new trends of seaports management and service delivery.
Lead to loss of jobs
However, representatives from the Coast Youth Association, Chama Cha Uzalendo, Kenya National Muslim Advisory Council, the union and wananchi at the meeting said privatising the port would lead to the loss of 4,000 jobs. At present, the port has 7,000 employees.
In an interview with the Nation, Mr Kitungu said the government plans to convert the four conventional berths into a container terminal.
-
Submitted by wuod_aketchPosted October 27, 2009 01:33 PM
-
Submitted by dedacus
it is time we sensitized kenyans on matters of economics and investments. sad to say but its true that most of our union leaders and not well-versed in such matters.
Posted October 27, 2009 11:45 AM -
Submitted by ndotonoyao
The loss of jobs, concensus do not seem to be in the vocublary of this dictatorial individual Kitungu. Who is this Kitungu fellow? he is behaving like the port is his private property that the unions' views do not matter? Every development policy has a legitimate protocol that enshrines ettiquette and natural justice. If he knew the privatization would continue with or without other stakeholders views, then why call a meeting in the first place? these are the kind of technocratic dictatorships Kenya doesn't need.
Posted October 27, 2009 01:50 AM -
Submitted by wuod_aketch
No infrastructure has ever been improved through privatization. Be it in Britain (railways), Germany, USA ... Public assets are often sold to friends or people close to the government at throw away prices. Privatization is daylight robbery. Parliament should disband the Kibaki outfit called "Privatisation Commission of Kenya". Agressives like Kitungu should be sent packing - these are the likes of Ringera.
Posted October 27, 2009 01:37 AM -
Submitted by flkiranga
As much as privatisation of the port might be necessarty,it should be packaged togather with Investment creation in other sectors to create more jobs;that way the fear of job losses would be minimised.This would improve the Union's confidence in further discussions.
Posted October 27, 2009 12:43 AM




RSS
Can somebody remind us of the date the Rift valley railway came into action? Has the railway freight and passenger transport improved an iota?In fact the Consortium has only managed to reduce the freight traffic in the two years since taking control. As for passenger services, we are yet to see. So, for those gargling themselves all day long with privatization, please give us a break. Those corporations pretending to improve service deliveries are just outlets/letterboxes for the corrupt politicians to transfer taxpayers money to tax havens. Wake up fellow Kenyans Kumekucha.