News

Kenya AG to sue US over travel ban

Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating
Attorney General Amos Wako during a news conference at his Sheria House office on November 4, 2009 where he said that he intends to sue the United State for defaming him after his visa was revoked. Photo/STEPHEN MUDIARI

Attorney General Amos Wako during a news conference at his Sheria House office on November 4, 2009 where he said that he intends to sue the United State for defaming him after his visa was revoked. Photo/STEPHEN MUDIARI 

By ANTHONY KARIUKIPosted Wednesday, November 4 2009 at 16:24

In Summary

  • Mr Wako says he will take the fight to the US.

Kenya's Attorney General Amos Wako has signalled his intention to sue the United States for defamation.

Related Stories

Mr Wako said that he had "received notification that my visa has been revoked for blocking reforms," more than a week after the US Assistant Secretary for African Affairs Jonnie Carson said his country had banned a senior Kenya Government official for blocking reforms.

Mr Carson, however, withheld the name of the banned official only saying he was of "influence" and his duties required extensive travel.

Addressing a news conference at his Sheria House office on Wednesday, Mr Wako said the ban due to "engaging in corrupt actions which have adversely affected the national interests of the United States of America," were off the mark and amounted to defaming him.

The AG said that he will seek legal redress in the US adding: "I will take the fight there."

"Although I am totally indifferent to the revocation of the visa and I have absolutely no desire to visit the United States of America, nevertheless; in view of the reasons given, which are defamatory, it is my intention to seek legal advice with a view to institute legal proceedings in the US," said Mr Wako.

He dismissed claims that he was an obstacle to reforms saying that he had overseen changes in the country including the transition from a one-party state to a fully fledged multi-party democracy.

He said that he has always "kept the fire of reforms within government" adding that he was an "adviser and not a decision maker."

He added: "During the period, I initiated an ambitious Legal Reform Programme by appointing over 17 Task Forces which resulted in re-drafting of many areas of law resulted in many legislations which have already been enacted."

"The enacted legislations have all enhanced democracy, the Rule of law, Human Rights, Transparency and Accountability."

He rejected notions that he had obstructed reforms under Agenda 4 saying that "if anything he had facilitated the said agenda."

"I am pleased to state that only yesterday (Tuesday), as a member of the Task Force on Police Reforms we handed over the Report of the Task Force to the President and the Prime Minister.

"I am particularly delighted and proud that as a member of the Committee of Experts, we have more or less finalised the drafting of the harmonised new Constitution."

He posed: "Are these the activities of a man who is accused of being anti-reform?"

He questioned Mr Carson's expectation on the AG to "successfully investigate and prosecute" Anglo Leasing-type cases when America's security agencies including the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) cannot do so because of "the law in the US to secure the cooperation of key suspects and /or witnesses in the Anglo Leasing-type cases."

1 | 2 Next Page »

Add a comment (101 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by gumo
    Posted November 06, 2009 09:14 AM

    I would urge USA Attorney General to enter nolle prosequi as soon as Wako case is filed in court.

  2. Submitted by JonBforever
    Posted November 06, 2009 07:53 AM

    "Guilty Until Proven Innocent."

  3. Submitted by peter mugambi
    Posted November 06, 2009 07:32 AM

    And what does our president's silence mean?Is he in support of this ban or against it? We can only speculate that he is for it, because he is not making any noise in defence of one of his top aides. Or he does not give a damn.After all, he seems to have banned himself from travelling to any mzungu land just like our founding Father who never even went to a neighbouring country let alone wazungu land.

See all 101 comments

Alternative text.