News

How land deals of the early 1960s came to haunt the country during poll chaos

  Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating
Solio ranch in Kieni West was one of the big farms owned by colonial settlers. A group of women from Chaka trading centre, some 10km away, is pictured carrying vegetables for sale at the ranch  which has been allocated to Kenyans. Photo/ JOSEPH KANYI

Solio ranch in Kieni West was one of the big farms owned by colonial settlers. A group of women from Chaka trading centre, some 10km away, is pictured carrying vegetables for sale at the ranch which has been allocated to Kenyans. Photo/ JOSEPH KANYI 

By John Kamau
Posted  Monday, November 9  2009 at  22:00

In Summary

  • WB gave loan to new government to buy land from settlers who feared to stay on

A report by J.H. Lategan and sent to the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Lands and Settlement, Mr N.S.Carey Jones, now sheds light into what went wrong in the initial stages of the Yeomen experiment which was to be rolled out countrywide.

The Lategan Report blames white farmers’ selfishness and drunkenness and elitist behaviour of the new African farmers.

He wrote: “The European farmers, for purely selfish reasons, were anxious for this scheme to succeed when it was initiated, their idea being that if this scheme succeeds they would be in a favourable position to get rid of their own farms at good prices to the settlement board.”

The report continued: “Yeomen farmers consider themselves to be gentlemen who are above the menial tasks of farming and they spend most of their time in the bars of Nakuru, the work being left to the women and labourers.”

The Yeomen Scheme was highly subsidized by the colonial government as a direct reward to those who had supported the colonial structure. While all the labourers had been supplied and paid for by the government, Mr Lategan, the investigator, found only one farmer at the Bahati farm. Besides drunkenness of the farmers, they also did not have extension officers and relied on neighbouring European farmers for advice.

“Some of them still appear to try peasant farming, which means that they plant crops, such as beans in between the rows of maize,” said the report. The failure of the Yeomen scheme meant that the government was forced to revise its policy.

It was agreed with both the British government and World Bank that land would be transferred through normal sales in open market to new owners or cooperative societies.

The norm

Share This Story
Share

It was this last effort that became the norm shortly after Independence and which the government of Jomo Kenyatta flagged on enthusiastically.

The Yeomen Scheme only lasted until 1961, when it was re-named Assisted Farmers scheme. While the government, with funding from World Bank and British government, started buying for these Assisted Farmers, what slowly emerged was a new crop of big land owners—amidst general landlessness and poverty.

« Previous Page 1 | 2

Add a comment (18 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by surakug

    I have always maintained that the world bank, IMF, UN e.t.c are just some shadow organisations to cover up for the west. Why would anyone buy land from these white farmers? land that they took bu force from the Africans? Add that salt to injury that we kenyans are still paying for these loans? And when Mugabe chases them they unite , but Tvasingirai ( or whatever he is called)? This people is modern colonialism.

    Posted  November 12, 2009 09:32 PM  
  2. Submitted by lulu

    Now you know why the whiteman was called a "mzungu" becuase he "zungukad" us "kiakili" we bought from him what he never bought from us. Then our own people made us pay the loans for them through taxes which helped them grab the land. What a serious farce!

    Posted  November 11, 2009 11:43 PM  
  3. Submitted by thiurikiuri

    We can mobilise the masses in Zimbabwe-like mob rule and take back our stolen property from these thieves. Reality - do you expect these elites who still rule us to sit back and watch this process? I am poor, partly due to actions of these thieves, but I understand any attempts for overall takeover will make me at least 10 times poorer. I can see my likes in Zimbabwe. I‘ll count my blessings and soldier on with gradual social changes, vote wisely, push for constitutional and institutional reform. I'll not see much change in my lifetime but my children will.

    Posted  November 11, 2009 06:27 PM  
  4. Submitted by olegaita66

    This is the right moment for the KG to solve this land issue once and for all.Just dissolve all title deeds and put it under govt trust land and can only be leased out for use.Parliament then should enact an authority that is to manage land use all across Kenya.Since our economy is very much pegged to the land,this should be done meticulously.But again where in Africa can you see meaningful debate to the real concerns of a country?

    Posted  November 11, 2009 05:10 PM  
  5. Submitted by schii

    I hope that we are not only talking about land in RV, remember that most peasants were also forced to leave their ancestral land in provinces like Central and where were they to go? Am sure they are these people who suffered greatly during post election violence and such like clushes that have arisen in certain areas even long before 2007. Lets be fair to all

    Posted  November 11, 2009 11:46 AM  

See all 18 comments