News

How land deals of the early 1960s came to haunt the country during poll chaos

  Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating
Solio ranch in Kieni West was one of the big farms owned by colonial settlers. A group of women from Chaka trading centre, some 10km away, is pictured carrying vegetables for sale at the ranch  which has been allocated to Kenyans. Photo/ JOSEPH KANYI

Solio ranch in Kieni West was one of the big farms owned by colonial settlers. A group of women from Chaka trading centre, some 10km away, is pictured carrying vegetables for sale at the ranch which has been allocated to Kenyans. Photo/ JOSEPH KANYI 

By John Kamau
Posted  Monday, November 9  2009 at  22:00

In Summary

  • WB gave loan to new government to buy land from settlers who feared to stay on

When chaos erupted in the Rift Valley shortly after the controversial 2007 Presidential vote tally, the land question became the bone of contention.

But why did settlement schemes – and private land buying deals - turn out to be the nation’s nightmare in the Rift Valley Province, more than 45 years later.

Original correspondence traces the settlement confusion to the colonial government plan to create a set of elite African farmers who were to replace the white farmers in the Rift Valley in what was originally known as Yeomen Settlement Scheme.

When this failed, the idea of peasant settlements was floated, but this also failed at both at the social and political levels.

Under pressure from white farmers who feared that they might be abandoned in Kenya after independence, the British government managed to push the independence negotiators — led by conservative teacher-turned-politician James Gichuru — to allow for a smooth transfer of farms lest they wrecked the economy, which was anchored on colonial agriculture.

Worried that they might inherit a bankrupt nation, the negotiators agreed to a scheme mooted in Lancaster House where Britain would guarantee a World Bank loan to Kenya government which would buy all the land owned by white settlers to settle Africans. The Kenyan tax-payers were to pay for that loan.

The story begins shortly before independence when the British made it clear at the independence negotiations that the new Kenya government would have to buy the land from the white settlers.

By then some of the white farmers started mortgaging their farms with banks complicating an already complex situation and leaving the politicians – led by James Gichuru – in a fix.

Share This Story
Share

Mr Gichuru and his team knew that Kenya was an agricultural economy and if the land question was not solved they would inherit a bankrupt nation.

By then Mr Kenyatta, the man who was to get the mantle from Mr Gichuru, was still in restriction. Mr Gichuru was asked to inform his colleagues that there would be no free land come independence, an issue that divided the Kanu party.

But behind the scenes, the World Bank in 1960 had opened discussions with Kenya’s interim chairman of the settlement board, Mr J.F Lipscombe, on how to start settling the first group of Yeomen Farmers – as they were then known – into the white highlands to become the first set of African farmers who would protect the economy from ruin. Yeomen Scheme was more than that. It was a clever plot to pass all the big land into a few hands.

Aware that radicals might jeopardize the efforts, the World Bank and the colonial government on November 29, 1961 entered into a pact which meant that all officials who would join the Lands and Settlement docket, and especially positions that touched on the loan, would have to be approved by them.

The Yeomen programme was the first experiment to be carried out in the Rift Valley and envisaged buying some 240,000 acres of high potential land which was to be broken into 100 acre parcels. But while money was borrowed from the World Bank, the Yeomen Scheme flopped after it became hard to get African farmers who could manage such projects.

The original idea had emanated from Governor Malcolm MacDonald whose pet idea was to open the White Highlands to a select group of Kenyans who would farm alongside the whites. Documents show Mr Lipscombe had told the officials that the only way to get such a huge number of farmers would be to hunt for them in the non-scheduled African land units.

The first experiment was carried out on Luckhurst Farm, which was nicknamed Bahati, Kiswahili for good luck, and was divided into 8 farms the largest portion being 186 acres and the smallest 49.7 acres. The original idea was that the farmers would sell their maize to Kenya Farmers Association but at the end of the harvest only one farmer delivered his crop.

1 | 2 Next Page »

Add a comment (18 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by surakug

    I have always maintained that the world bank, IMF, UN e.t.c are just some shadow organisations to cover up for the west. Why would anyone buy land from these white farmers? land that they took bu force from the Africans? Add that salt to injury that we kenyans are still paying for these loans? And when Mugabe chases them they unite , but Tvasingirai ( or whatever he is called)? This people is modern colonialism.

    Posted  November 12, 2009 09:32 PM  
  2. Submitted by lulu

    Now you know why the whiteman was called a "mzungu" becuase he "zungukad" us "kiakili" we bought from him what he never bought from us. Then our own people made us pay the loans for them through taxes which helped them grab the land. What a serious farce!

    Posted  November 11, 2009 11:43 PM  
  3. Submitted by thiurikiuri

    We can mobilise the masses in Zimbabwe-like mob rule and take back our stolen property from these thieves. Reality - do you expect these elites who still rule us to sit back and watch this process? I am poor, partly due to actions of these thieves, but I understand any attempts for overall takeover will make me at least 10 times poorer. I can see my likes in Zimbabwe. I‘ll count my blessings and soldier on with gradual social changes, vote wisely, push for constitutional and institutional reform. I'll not see much change in my lifetime but my children will.

    Posted  November 11, 2009 06:27 PM  
  4. Submitted by olegaita66

    This is the right moment for the KG to solve this land issue once and for all.Just dissolve all title deeds and put it under govt trust land and can only be leased out for use.Parliament then should enact an authority that is to manage land use all across Kenya.Since our economy is very much pegged to the land,this should be done meticulously.But again where in Africa can you see meaningful debate to the real concerns of a country?

    Posted  November 11, 2009 05:10 PM  
  5. Submitted by schii

    I hope that we are not only talking about land in RV, remember that most peasants were also forced to leave their ancestral land in provinces like Central and where were they to go? Am sure they are these people who suffered greatly during post election violence and such like clushes that have arisen in certain areas even long before 2007. Lets be fair to all

    Posted  November 11, 2009 11:46 AM  

See all 18 comments