News

Kenya lawyers question Jaoko's ouster

  Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating
International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) executive director George Kegoro (left) and Fida's Grace Maingi during a news conference after attending a jurists' forum on the brainstorming of proposed nominee to the vetting tribunal at the Norfolk Hotel. They questioned the removal of Kenya National Human Rights and Equality Commission's chair Florence Jaoko September 8, 2010.  JENNIFER MUIRURI

International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) executive director George Kegoro (left) and Fida's Grace Maingi during a news conference after attending a jurists' forum on the brainstorming of proposed nominee to the vetting tribunal at the Norfolk Hotel. They questioned the removal of Kenya National Human Rights and Equality Commission's chair Florence Jaoko September 8, 2010. JENNIFER MUIRURI  

By LUCAS BARASA
Posted  Wednesday, September 8  2010 at  12:04

Kenyan lawyers have questioned the alleged removal of Kenya National Human Rights and Equality Commission chair Florence Jaoko from office.

The International Commission of Jurists-Kenya, Federation of Women Lawyers and Law Society of Kenya said they were not aware of any legal provisions that mandates the commissioners to remove the chair.

“We are concerned that the National Commission has purported to remove from office its own chairperson. The reasons for purported removal remain unclear to us,” the Fida executive director Grace Maingi Kimani said.

Ms Kimani, her ICJ counterpart George Kegoro, Njonjo Mue (ICJ council member) and Felistas Njoroge (ICJ vice-chairperson) said if the commission is to remain accountable “this major development must be backed by solid reasons".

The reasons must not only be agreed on internally among the commissioners but must also be explained to the public which has expectations on the Commission, the lawyers said.

They said since the new Constitution merged the Gender Commission and the National Commission any decision on the chair must involve both units.

Seven out of the eight commissioners of the human rights body have passed a vote of no confidence on Ms Jaoko, stripped her off all her powers and appointed a committee of three to run it.

Ms Jaoko, has, however scoffed at her ouster saying the commissioners have no mandate to do so and insisted that she is still the head of the organisation.

Share This Story
Share

The new Constitution vests the expanded Commission with tremendous responsibility in the governance of the country and LSK, Fida and ICJ said it will need the goodwill of stakeholders if it is to discharge its responsibilities.

“We hope that the Commission recognises this fact and will therefore see the need to be accountable to us,” Ms Kimani said.

The lawyers also offered to mediate the internal problems in the Commission to overcome the challenges facing it.

They said the differences were not good at a time when the country is implementing the new Constitution.

The lawyers said it is important that the country remains focussed in implementation of the new constitution “and is not distracted by avoidable institutional problems in the governance institutions.”

The merging of the National Commission and that of Gender, they said enhances its responsibility and that it would now be required to “stand up in the gap between the government and the public and ensuring that the rights of the public are protected".

The Commission, an independent national human rights institution, core mandate is to further the protection and promotion of human rights in Kenya.

1 | 2 Next Page »

Add a comment (27 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by BELTANEFIRE5

    Iagree that it is not a good situation at the KNCHR but know for a fact the "workers" are not paid huge salarys I cannot comment on commssioners as it is unknown to me.I f thier isunrest over the chair and to avoid any more accusations perhaps Mr Hassan should state he will exclude himself from Chairpersons job.Let someone else be appointed.Perhaps Mr Victor Kamau LLB whos credentials for fighting the cause of the misrepresented are impeeccable

    Posted  September 09, 2010 12:11 PM  
  2. Submitted by ahadiyetu

    KNCHR is a rotten commission. They are only out to make bloody money and fight. Presenting biased report on post election violence has come to haunt them. they cheated the world.

    Posted  September 09, 2010 10:30 AM  
  3. Submitted by vintokim

    I think the good lady is on record as daring others faced with similar circumstances to quit.If as it seems she is unable to unify the commission so that it works together then she should do the most honourable thing and resign with is dignity intact.

    Posted  September 09, 2010 09:26 AM  
  4. Submitted by kokiorimba

    This circus at KNHRC must not take this direction. It would be prudent for the rest of the commissioners who think they cannot work with Jaoko to just resign and shame her if it is only for integrity's sake

    Posted  September 09, 2010 09:21 AM  
  5. Submitted by edkam210

    So, whose right is being trampled on? Jaoko's, Other Commissioners or Kenyans'? Let them give us a break. We demand performance and not side shows.Omar's Vuvuzela thinks thats performance. Statements or not by other commissioners will amount to nothing if we Kenyans do not benefit from KNHRC.

    Posted  September 09, 2010 08:26 AM  

See all 27 comments