News
Land scandal started off as part of noble move
Posted Tuesday, March 9 2010 at 20:39
A well-intentioned idea by City Hall to buy cemetery land ended up providing an avenue for fraudsters to swindle taxpayers of a whopping Sh260 million.
Audit reports by the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission (Kacc) and the Controller and Auditor General detail how the tendering process was infiltrated by shadowy middlemen working in cahoots with City Hall and government officials eager to make a killing.
The reports reveal how the conspirators inflated the cost of the land, hastened the release of the money, and paid the purported seller about a third of the quoted price before sharing the balance among themselves. At all times, government procurement procedures were either bent or overlooked altogether.
According to the Controller and Auditor General’s report, the idea of purchasing cemetery land, preferably within Nairobi, was first broached at a City Hall meeting in May, 2005, because the Langata cemetery was running out of burial space.
When it failed to identify such land within Nairobi, City Hall decided to extend the scope to the Nairobi Metropolis, meaning such land could now be obtained in adjoining districts such as Thika, Kiambu, Kajiado, Machakos, and Kangundo.
But the land had to meet certain mandatory requirements, including being at least 50 acres under one title deed, accessible by an all weather road, and supplied with water, electricity and telephone services. Besides, the soil depth had to be six feet, the report states.
An advertisement placed in the local dailies in September, 2008, attracted 12 bids but none met soil depth or all-weather road access requirements.
According to the Controller and Auditor General’s report, the sixth lowest bidder, Naen Rech Ltd, was declared the winner despite protests from the city planning department that no bidder had offered land suitable for cemetery use.
Naen Rech Ltd had offered 120 acres at Sh283 million — Sh259 million in excess of the independent valuation which put its market price at Sh24 million.
According to the report, the tender committee based its decision on a valuation conducted by one Mr A Otieno, who was passed off as a valuer at the Lands ministry. Subsequent investigations revealed that there was no such valuer at the ministry and that the valuation report had been forged.
Whereas the “winning” bidder was Naen Rech Ltd, the land was registered in the name of one Henry Musyoki Kilonzi, who duly turned up on December 19, 2008, to sign the sale agreement with City Hall.
“It has not been explained why the agreement or sale was signed by Mr Henry Musyoki Kilonzi while the tender had been awarded to M/S Naen Rech Ltd,” the auditors point out.
According to the audit report, Mr Kilonzi was to receive only Sh107 million while the balance of Sh175 million was shared out by unknown entities.
The more detailed Kacc report takes note of the protests lodged by the director of City Planning, Mr Patrick Tom Odongo, and the director of the Forward Planning Section, Mr John Koyier Barreh.
Kacc interviewed City Hall’s senior funeral superintendent, Mr David Mukuri Wanjohi, who also ruled that the soil profile of the land in question made it unsuitable for a cemetery.
-
Submitted by PeninnahNinaPosted October 25, 2010 12:57 PM
-
Submitted by krugutt
The coalition government will go down in history as one government where corruption in every sector of the economy runs amok. It has been corruption after corruption for the last 7 years or so and we are yet to see more! The media should continue to dig out where this vice exists and smoke them out, have them remain on the headlines until this cancer is completely destroyed if not minimized to its lowest level! Please keep the scandals at the department of defence alive on the headlines just like these others so that this fight does-not look one-sided! What-became-of-the-mega-scandal-at-the-ministry-of-education?
Posted October 25, 2010 11:34 AM -
Submitted by leenex
I have these querries for fellow readers:- 1.Mrs. Ngethe gave KACA a statement alleging that a Mr. Osiemo was introduced to her by the Nairobi Mayor who told her that Osiemo was representing Mudavadi. KACA has powers to record a statement from Mudavadi but chose not to bother,why? 2. Despite not speaking to Mudavadi, KACA prepares a report for the PM with it's "findings", stangely the report is received by media houses before the PM does - coincidence? Kenyans be the judge.
Posted March 11, 2010 08:03 AM




RSS
Too much of tax payers money is going into the hands of corrupt elite through corrupt deals.When they are charged, they are never jailed because they can afford to buy their way out with money they initially stole from the taxpayer. Catch 22 situation. The systems are themselves totally ineffective, useless, and corrupt. It's like sending a thief to catch a thief. But God will pronounce His judgement on them sooner than later.