News

Mutula steps in to settle row in rights team

  Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating
Chairperson of the Kenya National  Human Rights and Equality Commission Florence Jaoko (left) before she declined to speak to the press on Wednesday after a meeting with Justice and Constitutional Affairs minister Mutula Kilonzo at his Cooperative House offices on September 8, 2010. Photo/JENNIFER MUIRURI

Chairperson of the Kenya National Human Rights and Equality Commission Florence Jaoko (left) before she declined to speak to the press on Wednesday after a meeting with Justice and Constitutional Affairs minister Mutula Kilonzo at his Cooperative House offices on September 8, 2010. Photo/JENNIFER MUIRURI  

By LUCAS BARASA lbarassa@ke.nationmedia.com and DAVE OPIYO dopiyo@ke.nationmedia.com
Posted  Wednesday, September 8  2010 at  22:30

The government on Wednesday stepped in to try and resolve squabbles threatening the operations of its key human rights watchdog.

Justice minister Mutula Kilonzo summoned top officials of the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights to a meeting in his office to unravel leadership wrangles facing it.

Details of the two hour meeting remained scanty, but Mr Kilonzo later on told the Nation that he will not allow the commission “to go down the drain”.

“I had called the meeting to find out what is ailing the commission and whether the leadership squabbles I am reading in the media is true... it was just an exploratory meeting,” said Mr Kilonzo.

“I cannot allow this institution to go down the drain. I have a strong interest on what is happening in the commission as the line minister in charge. However, it is too early to discuss what transpired during our meeting in the media,” he added.

Seven out of the eight commissioners of KNCHR have passed a vote of no confidence on embattled chair Ms Florence Jaoko, stripped her of all her powers and appointed a committee of three to run the organisation.

Scoffed at ouster

Ms Jaoko has however scoffed at her ouster bid, saying the commissioners had no mandate to do so and insisted that she is still the head of the organisation.

Share This Story
Share

Although the law does not give the commissioners powers to remove the chairperson, Ms Jaoko’s critics argue that since they elected her they could also kick her out.

The commissioners meeting with the Justice minister appeared not to have achieved much. At one point, Mr Kilonzo left the meeting, leaving the commissioners to continue deliberations on their own.

Speaking after the meeting at Cooperative House on Wednesday, Ms Jaoko said they were holding consultations to resolve differences in the organisation.

At a separate press conference, lawyers appeared to defend Ms Jaoko by questioning her alleged removal from office. The International Commission of Jurists-Kenya, Federation of Women Lawyers and Law Society of Kenya said they were not aware of any legal provisions that mandated the commissioners to remove the chair.

“We are concerned that the rights commission has purported to remove from office its own chairperson. The reasons for purported removal remain unclear to us,” the Fida executive director Grace Maingi Kimani said.

Ms Kimani, her ICJ counterpart George Kegoro, Njonjo Mue (ICJ council member) and Felistas Njoroge (ICJ vice-chairperson) said if the commission is to remain accountable, “this major development must be backed by solid reasons”.

The reasons must not only be agreed upon internally among the commissioners but must also be explained to the public which has expectations on the Commission, the lawyers said.

1 | 2 Next Page »

Add a comment (5 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by ras2004

    Simbiri is not Maina. And should never be. The fact somebody like keeps shouting does not mean he is effective. Sweet Simbiri didn't end up as their chair by mistake. Jealousy has taken over these commissioners. Kibaki doesn't talk as much as Moi did, but we can all see the difference - political openness, reduced graft, new constitution, better roads etc. Fight on Simbiri. We need more works and less shouting. Much of this shouting has been used to solicit bribes from politicians to 'kill' a story.

    Posted  September 09, 2010 09:39 AM  
  2. Submitted by jelnam

    This is about the Commission. If there are good reasons for her removal, then the commissioners are well within their rights to remove her. It is unlikely that 7 commissioners could have ganged up against Mdme Jaoko on account of petty jealousy or other mundane reasons. They owe Kenyans an explanation, but we also don't have the wherewithal to jump to conclusions that the removal is unwarranted! They elected her to the position after all.

    Posted  September 09, 2010 05:43 AM  
  3. Submitted by kenyanpatriotabroad

    I know both Maina and Ms.Simbiri very closely.They differ only in style but not principle.Though Simbiri is not too vocal,she still is a strong and hardworking professional and her weaknesses are not beyond correction.I think she is entitled to a chance unless there is more evidence than we currently have.

    Posted  September 09, 2010 05:14 AM  
  4. Submitted by mikeotechi

    @jokaseda,in all fairness,an organisation is as strong as its leader.since mdme simbiri jaoko stepped in maina kiais shoes,that entity has been a pale shadow of itself.the ladies public image has been lack-lustre to say the least.hassan omars attempts to step in and uplift and salvage it have met with friction to the extent that he had to be forced to step down as vice-chair.much of that time,omar has been the public image of knhrc.

    Posted  September 09, 2010 04:36 AM  
  5. Submitted by jokaseda

    Many of us in the diaspora are asking to be enlightened about what it is that Ms Jaoko has done or failed to do that warrants her ouster.Every individual has his/her own style in achieving a given objective.The commissioners are not by any stretch of imagination within the law to remove Ms Jaoko.If she has not been found to misappropriate organization funds,all other accusations are personal and accordingly objectionable.If they are not happy, they are free to resign and move somewhere elso!

    Posted  September 09, 2010 01:46 AM