News
Population key to sharing of funds
Posted Sunday, September 5 2010 at 22:30
In Summary
| Top Five Counties | Bottom Five Counties | ||
County 1. NAIROBI | Population 3,138,369 | County 7. TAITA TAVETA | Population 284,657 |
| 38. KAKAMEGA | 1,660,651 | 5. TANA RIVER | 240,075 |
| 40 .BUNGOMA | 1,630,934 | 26. SAMBURU | 223,947 |
| 23. KIAMBU | 1,623,282 | 12. ISIOLO | 143,294 |
| 33. NAKURU | 1,603,325 | 6. LAMU | 101,539 |
Heavily populated counties are likely to get the bulk of funding from the National Government if population becomes the key factor in determining sharing of revenue.
The new Constitution requires that at least 15 per cent of all revenue collected by the central government be disbursed to the 47 counties.
However, the actual figures will be determined by the yet-to-be established Commission on Revenue Allocation whose job will be to come up with a criteria that will guide the sharing of tax money between the national government and the counties.
The criteria will include factors such as population, infrastructure, the economic needs of a county and its viability. The commission will have powers to recommend how the money will be shared.
To ensure fairness, Articles 202 and 203 of the constitution stipulate the conditions that the commission must adhere to when sharing out the money.
Fairness to all
Parliamentary Constitution Implementation Oversight Committee vice chairman Ababu Namwamba said the money will be shared in a way that takes into account fairness to all counties.
“For instance Kakamega County with nine constituencies and nearly two million people cannot get the same allocation as Vihiga that has four constituencies and less than half a million people.
“Equal mounts will result in unfairness to some counties and a formula will be specified in legislations that will be passed on counties,” he said.
According to Mr Nzamba Kitonga, the chairman of the Committee of Experts that wrote the new Constitution, all counties will first be allocate equal amounts before other factors are considered.
“The principle is that they start at the same amounts and then the factors in each are taken into account to determine the final figures,” he said.
The Constitution provides for an Equalisation Fund meant to give special attention for under-developed and neglected areas. Ms Njoki Ndung’u, a member of the Committee of Experts, said population will be the key factor.
“It is not possible for the counties to receive the same amounts. There are factors in the constitution which will determine the amounts and it is likely that big cities and metropolis will get huge amounts.”
Given the current budget figure of Sh1 trillion, it means that each county — should the money be shared equally — will receive Sh3 billion from the National Government. “You cannot imagine the Nairobi county receiving Sh3 billion because it cannot sustain its population,” she said.
If population is the main factor, Nairobi County with a population of 3.13 million, Kakamega (1.66 million), Bungoma (1.63 million), Kiambu (1.62 million) and Nakuru (1.60 million) will receive the highest amounts.
-
Submitted by mohamedhPosted September 06, 2010 03:51 PM
-
Submitted by mwolovi
It looks like we now welcome private funding on those counties. Does this alos mean that the counties can eliminate matatus and have their own county vehicles to run the routes.
Posted September 06, 2010 02:47 PM -
Submitted by GregPA
Come on people. Is this logic so difficult to understand? A nation is primarily its people. Population always takes precedence in development priority in any civilized nation on earth. There are indeed other factors but these are always secondary.
Posted September 06, 2010 12:45 PM -
Submitted by NDEBELE
exits tribalism, enters populationism?. However, knowledge is everything. the county that exploits knowledge-based resources will feed the whole country and even east africa. the county that waits for natural resources and population-based resource sharing will remain under-developed forever
Posted September 06, 2010 12:41 PM -
Submitted by holomisa
In future, those counties that fail to control their birthrates, won't they benefit from this failure?
Posted September 06, 2010 10:58 AM




RSS
I believe the contrary of this simply because no one asked overpopulated tribes to do so while they know they share resources with rest of the nation. resource distribution should be based on how big a land counties have and disregard high poulation reas.Central,Eastern and Rift Valley people better learn to do family planning.