Africa

Sudan leaders trade blame after Abyei ruling

  Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating
A Sudanese woman celebrates the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague in Abyei, central Sudan, July 22, 2009.  REUTERS

A Sudanese woman celebrates the decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague in Abyei, central Sudan, July 22, 2009. REUTERS 


Posted  Monday, July 27  2009 at  11:14

KHARTOUM, Monday (Reuters)

North and south Sudanese leaders have traded accusations over the roll-out of an international ruling on the disputed Abyei oil region, raising fears of a fresh dispute between the former civil war foes.

The accusations -- about control of oilfields and a referendum on Abyei's future -- came less than a week after both sides accepted the judgment on the boundaries of Abyei by a tribunal at The Hague's Permanent Court of Arbitration.

The United Nations, the United States and other governments had earlier hailed the ruling as a historic resolution to a bitter quarrel over the central Sudanese territory.

North and south Sudan have argued and fought for decades over Abyei, which is surrounded by oilfields.

The issues of its borders and ownership were so sensitive they were left undecided in the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement that ended a 22-year civil war between Sudan's Muslim north and its mostly Christian south.

Both sides, which have clashed over Abyei since 2005, agreed last year to refer the matter to the Hague for a final ruling.

The Hague tribunal on Wednesday re-drew the area's boundaries, producing new maps that ceded the key Heglig and Bamboo oilfields to north Sudan's Southern Kordofan region while leaving huge tracts of fertile land inside Abyei.

Share This Story
Share

The positions of the borders are particularly important because the residents of the newly defined Abyei area have been promised a referendum on whether to join north or south Sudan in January 2011. That same day, southerners are also due to vote on whether to split off as a separate country.

Hague ruling

Both north and south leaders promised to respect the Hague ruling whichever way it fell.

But senior members of each side have released antagonistic statements to local media since the judgement, over the control of the re-zoned oilfields and voting rights in the referendum.

The state Sudan Vision newspaper on Sunday reported Khartoum would stop paying a proportion of Heglig's oil revenues to the south after the ruling.

Taban Deng Gai, governor of the south's Unity State for the south's dominant Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM), told Reuters the north had been premature in claiming the Heglig oilfield after the ruling, because the drill site was still up for grabs under a separate border dispute.

Gai said officials had documentary proof showing Heglig was part of Unity not Kordofan, and would present their case to a separate commission on demarcating Sudan's entire north-south border.

1 | 2 Next Page »

Add a comment (0 comments so far)