Politics
Draft law: Raila and Kibaki lead separate talks
President Kibaki (right) and PM Raila Odinga met at Harambee House on Tuesday, their first since PM's controversial suspension of Ministers Ruto and Ongeri. Photo/FILE
Posted Monday, January 11 2010 at 22:30
President Kibaki and Prime Minister Raila Odinga on Monday held closed-door meetings of their parties to discuss the positions they will take on the revised draft constitution.
President Kibaki met Party of National Unity leaders in his Harambee House office while Mr Odinga hosted Orange Democratic Movement bigwigs at the Treasury Building.
The two groups were said to have analysed the draft presented to the Parliamentary Select Committee on the Constitution last Friday.
Common position
PSC has organised a retreat for its members on January 17 to discuss the document. ODM and PNU are meeting under the auspices of the Management Committee on Grand Coalition Affairs to agree on a common position ahead of the retreat. The PNU meeting, which started at 10am and ended at 1pm, was attended by among others, deputy PM Uhuru Kenyatta, Cabinet ministers Moses Wetang’ula and Mutula Kilonzo and assistant ministers Peter Munya, David Musila and Mwangi Kiunjuri and Kaloleni MP Kambi Kazungu.
The ODM meeting, which started a few minutes after 11am, ended at 2pm. It was attended by deputy PM Musalia Mudavadi, Cabinet ministers William Ruto, Charity Ngilu, Sally Kosgei, James Orengo, assistant ministers Joseph Nkaissery and MPs Ababu Namwamba and Chachu Ganya. All leaders who attended the two meetings are members of the PSC.
Those who attended the ODM meeting, speaking on condition they should not be named because the discussions were confidential, were cautious, saying, they found some provisions of the original Bill had been watered down. The group will meet again on Tuesday and Wednesday to take positions “on the many issues which have come up” before the management committee meets on Thursday.
Those at the meeting said the party favoured a PM with executive powers under a parliamentary system of government. However, they said they would go to the coalition meeting with an “open mind, ready to negotiate”. They also said they wanted the functions, powers and responsibilities of the office of the PM and those of the President spelt out clearly to avoid role conflict.
They also warned against directly transforming the current local authorities into devolved units. The ODM leaders also preferred the staggered implementation of the new constitution until it is fully completed by 2012. They were, however, divided on whether two drafts should be taken to the referendum.
Those at the PNU meeting said their party wanted two drafts at the referendum for “yes-yes” vote. PNU also wants the law on review amended to dissolve the Committee of Experts, which has been in charge of writing the draft.
Party positions
“The party believes that the experts have finished their work and the remaining work should be left to the PSC through amendments to the law,” a PNU source, who asked not to be named discussing the party position at this time, said. Interviews with various people at the meeting showed that PNU favoured an executive with one centre of power.
The CoE has proposed a “hybrid” system with power shared by a president and prime minister. The PNU source said their party would only accept a hybrid system if it followed the Tanzanian model. In Tanzania, the president is the Head of State and Government and appoints a PM who is leader of government in Parliament.
On the legislature, the sources said their party was opposed to the creation of a Senate, but said the matter was still being discussed. They said they will push for members of the National Assembly to be elected. They want a 400-seat Parliament with 300 MPs directly elected and 100 proposed by parties. The seat will then be shared through mixed member proportion using party lists with women getting 60 seats.
PNU will also use the retreat to push for all boundaries to be based on a one-man-one-vote system. However, the party wants the equality of votes principle to allow for a 10 per cent deviation in areas larger than 9,000 square kilometres. According to PNU, this formula will lead to the creation of four extra parliamentary seats in North Eastern and four in Turkana.
-
Submitted by olegaita66Posted January 13, 2010 12:42 AM
-
Submitted by cmulisa
I understand the apprehension to try new things, but we need a parliamentary system which forces accountability and consensus among the political leaders. Will it slow and even frustrate us sometime, sure, but overall, its pros outweigh Kenyatta’s/Moi/Kibaki’s style of governance. The days of the African Strong Man are over in Africa’s new political dispensation. Charles Mulisa.
Posted January 12, 2010 10:43 PM -
Submitted by jacquelineakinyi
Democracy is not a noun but a verb.it is a continous process.there is nothing wrong with Kibaki and Raila having different meetings.Our diversity is our strength.
Posted January 12, 2010 06:38 PM -
Submitted by vgogero
The two sides should realise that it is not my way or no way .But give and take that builds consesus
Posted January 12, 2010 05:36 PM -
Submitted by Make1
Is the collective intelligence of kenyans not enough? Why should mps have the final say on the way to go? The document should be presented to kenyans as is straight from the COE.
Posted January 12, 2010 05:05 PM




RSS
Let Kenyans not trust politicians on this,these are people as we have all seen ready to bankrupt the country just 2 make themselves financial comfortable.Other times we have seen politicians ochestrate tribal clashes.They could do anything to influence upon the draft into their interests rather than the ppl.