Politics
Fresh demands jolt MPs law review talks
Members of Parliament at the sensitisation retreat on the proposed constitution on March 17, 2010. Photo/JENIFFER MUIRURI
Posted Wednesday, March 17 2010 at 22:30
The push for a common position on the draft constitution on Wednesday got off to a bumpy start after the Grand Coalition partners differed publicly before the consensus-building retreat began.
The Orange Democratic Movement and Party of National Unity called separate press conferences to state their positions on the draft. MPs are on Thursday expected to tackle, clause by clause, the contents of the draft in a bid to close ranks before debate begins in Parliament next week.
Party’s demands
ODM declared its list of demands which it insisted were critical to the new set of laws, which it said reflected the views of Kenyans. The PNU team read mischief in the fresh demands by their rivals and accused them of going to the three-day retreat at the Kenya Institute of Administration (KIA) in Kabete to scuttle consensus-building efforts.
ODM chairman Henry Kosgey stated that they would not compromise on a three-tier government, strong senate, equitable distribution of resources and additional factors in demarcating electoral units. Mr Kosgey said ODM was speaking on behalf of Kenyans who voted for the party in the last elections.
“There are irreducible minimums that will satisfy the ODM constituency, key among these are a strong devolved government backed by a strong senate that will be the upper House,” he said. The ODM move seemed to take their PNU by surprise. The PNU side quickly called a press conference to question the reason for their rivals raising issues which were meant to be discussed indoors at the retreat.
Speaking on behalf of the PNU coalition, Information minister Samuel Poghisio said ODM’s demands were aimed at scuttling the retreat which they (ODM) were unwilling to attend from the beginning. Mr Poghisio, the ODM Kenya chairman, warned that similar tactics were used to derail the Bomas Conference on the constitution in 2003 and 2004.
“We must not leave this place without agreeing on the way forward… this is how Bomas was derailed and we don’t want to go that route,” Mr Poghisio said. Mr Jeremiah Kioni (Ndaragwa, PNU) and George Thuo (Juja, PNU) asked their coalition colleagues to raise their issues in the plenary instead of engaging in public sideshows.
The three were accompanied by Mr David Musila (Mwingi South, ODM-K), Mwangi Kiunjuri (Laikipia East, PNU), Ephraim Maina (Mathira, Safina) and George Nyamweya (Nominated, PNU). There was a sigh of public relief on Tuesday when MPs unanimously voted to adjourn the House to go for the retreat aimed at giving them a deeper understanding of the draft and building a common position on sticky issues.
On Wednesday, National Assembly Speaker Kenneth Marende opened the retreat with a strong message to MPs to put aside power games and get the review on course. “Power games notwithstanding, I urge all MPs to be open-minded to pre-empt the options of rigid positions that may derail the process,” he said.
Similar sentiments were made by Parliamentary Select Committee on the review process chairman Abdikadir Mohamed and vice-chairman Ababu Namwamba during the opening ceremony. The two sides, aware of the political power stakes involved in the review process, summoned their think tanks to KIA to help whenever necessary.
On ODM’s side were Prime Minister Raila Odinga’s coalition advisor Miguna Miguna and Moi University law lecturer Mutakha Kangu. The PNU team which includes former Siakago MP Justin Muturi and Mr Peter Kagwanja will join the talks on Thursday.
On Wednesday, the MPs were taken through the draft constitution by Mr Abdikadir and Mr Namwamba with occasional interjections by Cabinet ministers Mutula Kilonzo and James Orengo. Debate on the draft begins today when the two teams are expected to place on the table their demands and seek consensus.
Reports by Alphonce Shiundu, Oliver Mathenge and Njeri Rugene
-
Submitted by robcat1Posted March 19, 2010 10:05 AM
-
Submitted by edkam
When you analyse carefully, both sides have varrying and changing demands overtime. PNU is always talking of a review here and there AND, ODM is always waiting for a moment to buldge and introduce its demands on top of PNU's demands. When will all this "DEMANDs" thing end? We should be worried of fresh and varrying demands after this meeting, it will really make us go round in circles!!
Posted March 19, 2010 07:27 AM -
Submitted by malasow
north eastern and coast mps stand by your demand for own regions. there is nothing like kenya but mean tribal states out to dominate and colonise others. through real regions we should be able to influence decisions and matters of our concern
Posted March 18, 2010 09:20 PM -
Submitted by ekweyu
I think ODM are doing this on purpose so as to make sure the retreat is finished without discussing anything. I think they are not after the proposals they have made but rather have the constitution passed as is. This is a tactic that PNU didn't see coming.
Posted March 18, 2010 05:32 PM -
Submitted by hedabovewater
People like wersslywer cant be serious.From your comments and many like you, its obvious you havent read the final draft(Feb 23) or the comments attached. This has nothing to do with ODM- they just happen to be right thats all. PNU's position is that that suggests we dont need a new constitution- all their suggestions are contained in the current constitution imperial presidency and a powerful central govt yet ODM has bent over backwards to accomodate their wayward demands. PNU show goodwill, if you have any, now and accomodate the views of Kenyans as expressed by the COE.
Posted March 18, 2010 04:39 PM




RSS
Why is it that all arguments in this debate are based on current political standings? ODM are argiung from a position of not being in power whereas PNU are making their points as though they will be in power forever. Positions change and what one might find convenient today is not the same for tomorrow. Objectivity... not subjectivity is what we need as Kenyans.