Politics

ICC: Why Raila is walking tightrope

  Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating
Prime Minister Raila Odinga. Photo/FILE

 

By SUNDAY NATION TEAM newsdesk@ke.nationmedia.com
Posted  Saturday, January 28  2012 at  22:30

In Summary

  • The ICC decision committing four Kenyans to trial is the new pivot around which the Kibaki succession will revolve.
  • Mr Odinga was on Saturday mum on the fate of rivals Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto as his wife Ida and lieutenants issued conflicting statements.
  • Mr Kenyatta says he will not resign as deputy PM and maintains he will be in the presidential race. Mr Ruto, too, has vowed to be on the ballot.

The impending trial of four Kenyans at the International Criminal Court is likely to be a pivotal issue in the next General Election with two of the accused already showing their intention to turn it into a referendum on the trials.

At the rallies they addressed in Eldoret on Friday and in Kiambu on Saturday, Deputy Prime Minister Uhuru Kenyatta and Eldoret North MP William Ruto painted the race to succeed President Kibaki as a battle to stop Prime Minister Raila Odinga from ascending to the presidency.

That emotive pitch to their supporters in their respective backyards is likely to provide the key story line of the succession battle in the months to come.

Mr Kenyatta and Mr Ruto, who have both said they will be running for president, are in a loose alliance of politicians identified with their opposition to Mr Odinga.

However, they have yet to find a formula to pick one candidate to run against the PM.

The duo have consistently attempted to cast the PM as having something to do with the trials, although they have not provided proof for their claims. (READ: Uhuru blames violence on Raila)

Political analyst Karuti Kanyinga warns that such mobilisation could easily take the country back to the dark days of 2007.

Prof Kanyinga points out that the efforts by politicians to use the International Criminal Court (ICC) as an election issue threatens stability.

Share This Story
Share

“The continuing mobilisation of communities and grouping of leaders along ethnic lines is a stark reminder that this can easily push the country to the precipice,” he says.

“The offhand attitude of the leaders towards the ICC ruling and a similarly cavalier attitude to the new Constitution and its institutions are likely to fail the country yet again.”

On Saturday, a group of ODM MPs defended the Prime Minister against attacks by MPs allied to Mr Kenyatta and Mr Ruto.

Assistant minister Alfred Khangati said these individuals were being dishonest because most of them had supported the ICC process in Parliament.

“They were loud in saying let’s go to The Hague and now they are accusing Mr Odinga of scheming for the downfall of some of those whose charges have been confirmed by the court,” Mr Khangati said during the burial of Paul Luyali Khaniri, brother to assistant minister George Khaniri at Kapsotik in Vihiga.

Mr Odinga was among the mourners. Others who spoke in defence of Mr Odinga were MPs Josphat Nanok (Turkana South), George Khaniri (Hamisi), Yusuf Chanzu (Vihiga) and Justus Kizito (Shinyalu).

They were apparently responding to remarks made by the entourage of MPs who accompanied Mr Kenyatta and Mr Ruto to their weekend meetings.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 Next Page »

Add a comment (96 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by eliasagai

    Somebody pls help? Where is Raila coming in here? He and Kibaki have been Championing Local Tribunal. Raila is Not among OCAMPO FOUR. His wife IDA is fighting nail and tooth to have the suspects tried at home if they fail in their appeals! kindly Kenyans give RAILA credit where he deserves.

    Posted  February 01, 2012 10:14 AM  
  2. Submitted by Ngorotheru

    The ICC is just opening healing wounds. We don't need it to tell us who was responsible for the PEV, that's their legal jargon. Our layman jargon know most violence occurred in areas where leaders called for mass action "meaning chasing away madoa madoa" come from. They know what they told their people in the cover of darkness. These leaders know why people burned there own cities and towns selectively. Else why were non residents not chased away from say Machakos, Meru, Malindi, Marsabit, Nyeri, Muranga etc.

    Posted  February 01, 2012 09:58 AM  
  3. Submitted by karlkim5

    LET THE PEOPLE DECIDE

    Posted  February 01, 2012 08:30 AM  
  4. Submitted by mzewangoma

    @Minced_words and all who claim pple were killed bcoz Raila said "mass action",which dictionary told you mass action means kill pple???nationwide peaceful demonstrations is mass action.or is it blame Raila by all means or cost what it may.Ocampo is a learned man and knows what mass action means,and land issues btween kalenjin and kikuyu hav been there for decades,why dont we call a spade a spade??police and mungiki had nothing to do with Raila,so why Raila all the time?

    Posted  January 31, 2012 08:34 PM  
  5. Submitted by UncleG

    I personally believe that the appeal will go through and there shall be no reasonable grounds to believe that crimes were committed by the four. Gentlemen you stand acquitted.I wish you well in the next government

    Posted  January 31, 2012 01:05 PM  

See all 96 comments