Sun sets on Obama’s era of grand reforms

Jim WATSON | AFP
US President Barack Obama holds up a University of Washington Cross Country t-shirt during a rally for US Senator Patty Murray, D-WA, at the University of Washington in Seattle, Washington, on October 21, 2010. His party faces defeat in elections.

WASHINGTON, Tuesday

The curtain is all but certain to drop on President Barack Obama’s era of transformative reforms, even if Republicans fall short of their dreams of a mid-term election landslide next week.

Mr Obama, elected on a heady wave of hope and change in 2008, compiled a historic resume of domestic legislative triumphs, overhauling health care and Wall Street and pumping billions of dollars into the crisis-strangled economy.

He succeeded by uniting his Democratic Party and adding several moderate Republicans to pass bills over the objection of their leaders. But such tactics will become obsolete in the new Washington that emerges after November 2 polls.

Even if Republicans do not pull off a seizure of the House of Representatives and trim the Democratic edge in the Senate, as most analysts expect, Obama is sure to see his room for manoeuvre curtailed.

History, and the dynamics of power in Washington, suggest Mr Obama’s political capital will be depleted after a mid-term rebuke from voters, with a testing run-up to his 2012 reelection bid in prospect.

“One way or another, next week’s elections are going to deliver a humbling blow to the Democrats,” said Mr Costas Panagopoulos, editor of Campaigns and Elections magazine. “If they refuse to be humbled, they will pay a price at future elections,” added Panagopoulos, a Fordham University professor.

Polls predict a Republican House that would thwart Mr Obama on major legislation. Even if Democrats cling on, their wafer-thin majority would leave the balance of power with conservative members of their caucus.

A more evenly divided Senate meanwhile portends gridlock. Mr Obama appears to have two choices.

He could confront Republicans and pin them with the blame for an era of political conflict at the next presidential election in 2012.

Or, the president could coax Republicans toward areas of compromise and mutual interest — though any resulting legislation is likely to be far less consequential than his earlier triumphs.

During the 2008 campaign, Mr Obama raised eyebrows when he said that unlike former Democratic president Bill Clinton, Republican Ronald Reagan had changed the “trajectory” of American politics. But many observers now feel Mr Obama must borrow the playbook of compromise, domination of the center ground and savvy positioning that landed Clinton a second term after his party was hammered in 1994 mid-term polls.

“Is Obama willing to settle for a number of small, incremental measures that add up to something successful?” asked University of Arkansas professor Andrew Dowdle, voicing a key question of the next two years.

Some analysts say that education, deficit reduction, stalled foreign free trade deals and energy reform offer prospects for compromise if both parties feel an obligation to show voters they can work together. But efforts on global warming and comprehensive immigration reform appear to be out — unless Obama can launch a new era of reform with a second term mandate after 2012. (AFP)