Business News

Dream on United fans, Glazers don't have to sell

  Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating
Manchester United players celebrate after beating Aston Villa in the English League Cup final at Wembley Stadium in London on February 28. United had more reason to celebrate when they sprung to the top of the Premier League after edging out Wolves on Saturday. United lead Chelsea by two points although the have played a game more. Photo/ REUTERS

Manchester United players celebrate after beating Aston Villa in the English League Cup final at Wembley Stadium in London on February 28, 2010. More than 20,000 Manchester United fans have joined the campaign to force out the club's U.S. owners. Photo/REUTERS  

By REUTERS
Posted  Thursday, March 11  2010 at  14:22

Manchester United fans hoping another group can buy the Premier League champions from the Glazers can stop dreaming, said analysts and bankers.

They stressed the American family does not need to sell one of the world's most valuable sports clubs despite heavy debts.

As the Glazers' spokesman told Reuters on Wednesday: "Manchester United is not for sale."

Fans and a group of investors called the 'Red Knights' who are pushing for a change in ownership are, they said, forgetting one thing -- despite debts of 716.5 million pounds ($1.07 billion) the Glazer family does not need to sell the club.

"It's a group of fans," one U.S. banker, who asked not to be identified, said of the Red Knights group that includes former English Football League chairman Keith Harris.

"You can't do a hostile takeover of a privately held enterprise, so what are they talking about? Why would the Glazers sell?" the banker said, calling the idea a "fantasyland."

The Glazers, who also own the Tampa Bay Buccaneers National Football League team, bought United in 2005 for about 790 million pounds despite opposition from debt-wary fans.

The Red Knights said this month they were looking into a possible bid for the Old Trafford club that Forbes magazine last year valued at $1.87 billion.

Share This Story
Share

Won't overpay

The investor group, which also includes Goldman Sachs chief economist Jim O'Neill, has pledged up to 1.5 billion pounds in its bid, according to the London Times, but the Red Knights said it would not overpay.

While the Glazers have stayed mum on a possible deal, United chief executive David Gill said last week the Glazers would not bow to pressure to force them out.

A U.S. banker working on the sale of English Championship (second division) club Sheffield Wednesday agreed.

"There's nothing forcing them to entertain selling," Robert Tillis, CEO of Inner Circle Sports said of the Glazers. "They're long-term holders. They've said that pretty consistently."

Those who know the family said the speculation swirls because the Glazers are so tight-lipped, a strong family trait.

"Their history is buy and hold," said Marc Ganis, president of Chicago-based sports consulting firm Sportcorp Ltd. "Now, it may be buy and refinance and hold, and then look at refinancing again... but they retain their assets. They don't flip them.

1 | 2 Next Page »

Add a comment (2 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by InSidious

    Laico Regency come to mind. Or should I say RVR or perhaps Telecom or Orient Paper and Industries-Panpaper. I think the theme here is assets that we treasure can be lost to the most unlikely of owners, in the most unlikely manner, in the most unlikely environment. Perhaps that has to do with our-kind-of-business mkei, would you say?

    Posted  March 12, 2010 09:40 AM  
  2. Submitted by mkei

    What does Man U or the Glazers have to do with our-kind-of-business?

    Posted  March 11, 2010 04:15 PM