Ruling draws varying views from locals

What you need to know:

  • Mr Farah Ahmed said the governor would now have to complete his development projects in a county that has suffered marginalisation by successive national governments.

The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the election of Garissa Governor Nathif Jama drew varying reactions from the residents.

While some expressed their disappointment with the ruling, others said it affirmed that Mr Jama was fairly elected as the Governor of Garissa County.

Although there was not much outpouring of joy following the decision, some residents who spoke to the Nation expressed their happiness.

They said it was the right decision taken as Mr Jama had started development projects which he should be allowed to complete.

Clan rivalry

Mr Farah Ahmed said the governor would now have to complete his development projects in a county that has suffered marginalisation by successive national governments.

He asked local leaders to put their political differences aside and unite the people who have been split for many years by clan rivalry.

“What we need is development so that we benefit fully from the devolved system of governance. Let us give full support to Nathif Jama,” said Mr Ahmed.

Work together

Mr Ibrahim Abdi was one of those not happy with the verdict but was quick to add that the people of Garissa should close ranks and work together for the region’s good.

He said the move to challenge Mr Jama had heightened political temperatures, which now needed to cool down for the sake of development.

“We don’t agree with the decision of the judges but Garissa belongs to us all. I urge my fellow residents to maintain peace,” he said.