South Korea's Constitutional Court decriminalises adultery
Rolled-up condoms. South Korea's Constitutional Court on February 26, 2015 struck down a controversial adultery law. FILE PHOTO | GAROPHANIE | AFP.
What you need to know:
The 1953 statute aimed at protecting traditional family values and made South Korea one of the few non-Muslim countries to regard marital infidelity as a criminal act.
In the past six years, close to 5,500 people have been formerly arraigned on adultery charges — including nearly 900 in 2014.
Even though adultery should be condemned as immoral, state power should not intervene in individuals' private lives, says judge.
SEOUL
South Korea's Constitutional Court on Thursday struck down a controversial adultery law, which for more than 60 years had criminalised extra-marital sex and jailed violators for up to two years.
The nine-member bench ruled by seven to two that the 1953 statute aimed at protecting traditional family values was unconstitutional.
"Even if adultery should be condemned as immoral, state power should not intervene in individuals' private lives," said presiding justice Park Han-Chul.
The decision saw shares in the South Korean firm Unidus Corp, one of the world's largest condom manufacturers, soar by the daily limit of 15 percent on the local stock exchange.
It was the fifth time the apex court had considered the constitutional legality of the legislation, which had made South Korea one of the few non-Muslim countries to regard marital infidelity as a criminal act.
In the past six years, close to 5,500 people have been formerly arraigned on adultery charges — including nearly 900 in 2014.
216 WERE JAILED
But the numbers had been falling, with cases that ended in prison terms increasingly rare.
Whereas 216 people were jailed under the law in 2004, that figure had dropped to 42 by 2008, and since then only 22 have found themselves behind bars, according to figures from the state prosecution office.
The downward trend was partly a reflection of changing societal trends in a country where rapid modernisation has frequently clashed with traditionally conservative norms.
"Public conceptions of individuals' rights in their sexual lives have undergone changes," Park said, as he delivered the court's decision.
Reading the dissenting opinion, Justice Ahn Chang-Ho insisted the 1953 statute was a key protector of family morals, and warned that its abolition would "spark a surge in debauchery."
Under the law, adultery could only be prosecuted on complaint from an injured party, and any case was closed immediately if the plaintiff dropped the charge — a common occurrence that often involved a financial settlement.
