Editorials

Don’t sign this Bill Mr President

  Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating

Posted  Wednesday, December 10  2008 at  21:32

Parliament on Wednesday passed a repressive Bill which may come to haunt this country for many years to come.

In a near-unanimous decision, the House endorsed the Kenya Communication (Amendment ) Bill 2008, which gives the Government draconian powers to seize a broadcasting station’s equipment and to dictate programming content for radio and television.

We have consistently argued against this Bill and urged the President to reject it because of our belief in democratic government and civil liberties.

By its action on Wednesday, Parliament set the stage for media repression and thought control reminiscent of the one-party days Kenyans thought they had put behind them.

Today we appeal to President Kibaki, as the the guardian of this country’s liberties, not to sign into law a Bill which will curtail the freedom of the people who elected him to power – a law taking away their right to unhindered flow of information and ideas.

We have rejected this Bill for several reasons.

First, the proposals empowering a commission packed with permanent secretaries and other government appointees to issue ministerial ‘‘guidelines’’ to broadcast stations offends the principle of media independence.

It reintroduces censorship through the backdoor and leaves radio and television open to political manipulation.

Share This Story
Share

That MPs who on Wednesday waved the Bill through closed their eyes to this peril is a sad commentary on how personal interest and myopia can infect such an important process as legislation.

For it is clear the media is being punished for its vocal opposition to the refusal by MPs to pay tax on their salaries and allowances.

As late as last week, Government officials assured Kenyans that the clause allowing the Minister for Internal Security to assume a State of Emergency and seize broadcasting stations would be deleted from the Bill.

This clause was never removed - instead the power to declare the state of emergency has been reposed in the President rather than the Internal Security minister.

Intrusive state action

Whatever the basis for such intrusive state action, we must remind Kenyans that it was precisely such a law which provided cover for the infamous raid against the Standard Media Group.

It was not staged for reasons of national security, but because the newspaper’s reportage did not caress certain powerful individuals.

1 | 2 Next Page »

Add a comment (3 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by mzeemoja

    The media is happy to have ECK disbanded by legislation whether lawfully or unlawfully but cry foul when its own freedom which they have misused feel threatened. It has not even seen it fit to apologise to Kenyans for its role in the POEV. If media feel agrieved it should go to court and have the clauses deleted.

    Posted  December 11, 2008 02:07 PM  
  2. Submitted by bookaltd

    It seems as if we have travelled back to the 1980's. This clause is a joke, what is the point of the media if they are afraid to criticise the government for fear of reprisals. The comment by Jakoyo Midiwo MP is hilarious "If you scroll through any channel, it will not take five minutes before you see a nude picture on television.". If you are so prudish then don't watch those shows. I'm not some child who needs to be told what and what not to watch. A nanny state at it's worst.

    Posted  December 11, 2008 04:16 AM  
  3. Submitted by SJ502

    'Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too' - Voltaire

    Posted  December 10, 2008 11:35 PM