Letters

Hosting Al-Bashir was a signal to ICC that Kenya will not cooperate

  Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating

Posted  Sunday, August 29  2010 at  19:02

What a great display of worthlessness!” a friend quipped. Yet another one said: “It is a slap in the face of all those who thought for a minute that the new Constitution was to be in itself a breath of fresh air.”

I could not agree more with them. Amid all the pomp and fanfare that greeted the promulgation of the ratified constitution was the conspicuous presence of Omar al- Bashir at Uhuru Park. At the very least, his presence was an egregious violation of Kenya’s new constitutional chapter. His presence provided an anti-climax to this country’s constitutional hour.

Suffice it to say that President Kibaki had all the powers to invite whomever he wished for that auspicious occasion, subject only to one caveat – that in so doing, he does not ride roughshod over the sovereign will of the people of Kenya.

It must be remembered that Kenya has domesticated the Rome Statute making it part and parcel of our constitution. By inviting, dining and wining with a person indicted by ICC for committing heinous acts of murder against hundreds of thousands of Sudanese, President Kibaki violated not only the Rome Statute but he has also violated the sovereign will of the people of Kenya for which Parliament and the public must hold him accountable.

Clearly, State House knew that this invitation would create a huge furore locally and internationally but still went ahead to make this egregious mistake and place the country under a flood of international condemnation with possible sanctions in the pipeline.

The fact that the planners at State House were undeterred is perhaps a clear indication that there is a gang somewhere which is irked by the Rome Statute, and elected to use this invitation to send clear signals to ICC that Kenya will most certainly circumvent any attempts at retributive justice over the 2008 post election violence.

There is no doubt here that Kenya is hell bent on sending a strong statement to the world that its cooperation with ICC in terms of investigation, apprehending and prosecution of the suspected perpetrators of the post election violence, will not be guaranteed. There could be no better way than hosting and ensuring the safe passage of Al-Bashir to and from Kenya under the full glare of the world. Call it impunity if you like.

TOME FRANCIS, Bumula

Share This Story
Share


Add a comment (1 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by ShManzar

    While President Kibaki may have done so to send a signal to ICC, he nonetheless was also emphasising Kenya's freedom of action. More than that I'm dismayed at the show of mental slavery that is still part of the nation. Slaves to the previous masters still in mind. We cannot expect each decision by UN or ICC is also the correct one. So what happened to standing for the truth? Let US ratify ICC, stand trial for crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan, then talk.

    Posted  August 30, 2010 06:03 AM