Opinion
Let’s face it, we’re all tribal, so why not make the most of it?
Posted Friday, September 5 2008 at 17:33
In Summary
- The deliberate tribalisation in Malaysia has led to a common nation-state with limited racial tensions.
- Kenya has been at a crossroad for 45 years and is content with real development and the absence of war.
When they demand that the managing director of the Kenya Ports Authority be a coastal, Coast Province politicians are derided, yet they have a fundamental argument.
I share their view, but with the rider that all public appointments be based on tribe and merit in that order. Here are my thoughts.
In 1969, Mzee Jomo Kenyatta visited Kisumu for the first and last time. The public who were most probably Luo, pelted the old man with stones, and records show that many people were killed.
In the same year, Kuala Lumpur, the capital of Malaysia, was engulfed in bitter and bloody racial clashes.
After the clashes in Kisumu and Kuala Lumpur, Kenya and Malaysia took opposite directions in healing and reconciliation.
The people of Malaysia belong to three separate racial groups — indigenous Malays, Chinese and Indians. The British rule that used divide-and-rule tactics, created nearly three separate states in one.
Each racial group developed its own culture and economic stereotypes. There developed into popular nomenclature, the Malay farmer, the Chinese trader and the Indian estate labourer.
After the racial clashes of 1969, Malaysia made a deliberate and calculated choice to ethnicise opportunities in public employment, training and promotion.
Even politics was tribalised, with the largest coalition — Barisan National — being made up of three different parties, each representing the three different races. This racial balance is maintained in public service and politics.
The economy of Malaysia which, like Kenya, was colonised by Britain and gifted with independence nearly the same time, with a population half of Kenya’s, is 10 times ours.
The deliberate tribalisation in Malaysia has led to a common nation-state with limited racial tensions.
Dr Mahathir Mohamed, its benevolent but despotic leader from 1981 to 2003, took the Malaysian economy and nationalism to their apogee where it has remained since.
Malaysia is now a proud and Asian economic tiger. On the other hand, Mzee Kenyatta, after the Kisumu incident, made Nyanza a pariah region.
Public service was then monopolised by the Kikuyu, the President’s tribe. Other tribes were locked out.
When he took over in 1978, Mr Daniel arap Moi tried but with limited success to replace the Kikuyus with the Kalenjins.
-
Submitted by JosssephPosted September 07, 2008 07:03 PM
-
Submitted by kenboss
I am amazed by the intensity of tribal undertones in your comments.Kipkorir has missed the point.What Kenyans need urgently is a conducive environment to go about their trades, be it farming, fishing, herding or business. Employment in the public service per se is not a panacea to our problems. Malaysia has succeeded because of enacting an enabling environment that has harnessed and mobilized the peoples’ diverse capabilities to make a living. National income is not only derived from public service employment but from all productive activities that our hard workings Kenyans are capable to engage in.
Posted September 07, 2008 12:32 PM -
Submitted by Dom Mshindi
What is the moral of this story Mr. Kipkorir? I doubt the Pokomo (eg) are waiting for their turn to 'eat' by having one of their own as president. Your generalizations and fallacies are over the top. If Kenyatta was tribalistic that does not make his son Uhuru, least of all all Kikuyus tribalists. If Moi gave the plum jobs to Kalenjins that does not mean all Kalenjins would do the same. Kenyans are better than that Mr. Kipkorir. For example,do we care whether a teacher or physician is whatever tribe if he can deliver?
Posted September 07, 2008 04:06 AM -
Submitted by muhana
You claim that it was only with limited success that President Moi replaced the Kikuyus with Kalenjins. It would be great if you came clean and admitted that your tribe benefitted greatly from having Moi in government. Public service, armed forces, and all manner of appointments were given primarily to Kalenjins, and that is a fact. The only thing President Moi tried to do without success was to destroy the economic clout of the Kikuyu. Get your facts right next time. A little candidness goes a long way!
Posted September 07, 2008 02:39 AM -
Submitted by Ireadlines
..."When each tribe knows it has an equal and guaranteed chance in employment and leadership, sabotage will end, and love for tribe and country will begin". I agree with Donald. However, I must register my disgust with some comments here. It is to be expected that those benefitting from gov'nt now will do all they can to resist change. Grow up guys, it is never too late. Otherwise you can join us on this side of the fence in 2012.
Posted September 06, 2008 11:10 PM




RSS
Speak for yourself Kipkorir, if you're tribalist don't try to make it a case of "we". The last thing we need is another Kenyan trying to tell us that tribalism is in our DNA. I'm upset that Daily Nation gave you this forum to dish out this squalor.