Opinion

Four questions for the Cabinet team

  Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating
By MUTAHI NGUNYI
Posted  Saturday, October 25  2008 at  16:46

In Summary

  • Waki is a competent Judge. But has it occurred to you that he could be wrong?

What you have, therefore, whether you are on the list or not, is a ‘‘bastard’’ government. Not trusted, not credible and not legitimate enough!

But then you must ask the question: who is saying this? Is it the people of Kenya or the international community out there?

This brings me to the third question to you. What is Mr Kofi Annan still doing in town? And why is he appointing people to our commissions and receiving secret ‘‘lists’’ meant for government? Hasn’t he outlived his usefulness?

In my view, this man is too much on our face. He is beginning to sound like a retired old man looking for relevance.

But this is not fully true: peace-making is more political than war. As such, a peace-maker like Mr Annan is a skilful operator and a foremost politician.

As Cabinet, therefore, you must not embrace the man uncritically. He is not a priest or a traditional medicine man. At the core, the man is a raw politician with an agenda and interests to serve.

And this is why you must question the ‘‘envelope wisdom’’ of the Waki commission. But you must also question Mr Annan’s eagerness to go The Hague way!

My fourth question is about The Hague. How many of you are conversant with this international criminal court? My bet is that most of you are not.

Share This Story
Share

BUT AS A PROFESSIONAL WHO works in conflict countries, I can confirm to you that this is not a tested path. In fact almost all the Truth Justice and Reconciliation Commissions (TJRC) I have visited across Africa have been a flop.

Similarly, the idea of The Hague and the Special Tribunals suggested by Justice Waki are old school and driven by international interests. In other words, dignified nations do not take their suspects to The Hague.

This is a court used by ‘‘banana republics’’ arm-twisted by the West. As Cabinet, you must therefore spare the nation from the indignity of this process.

But you have one problem. According to the Waki Report, if you botch the establishment of a Special Tribunal, Mr Kofi Annan has to take the ‘‘envelope’’ to The Hague. This means that the process is unstoppable.

What is more: it has to happen by a certain date.

But if you are convinced about the folly of this process, you can stop it. And this is how.

Mr Annan is involved in our politics because you invited him. Without this invitation, he would have to return the ‘‘envelope’’ and go back to Kumasi in Ghana or wherever he came from.

« Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 Next Page »

Add a comment (9 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by bmmach

    this article is evidence of the lack of foresight and maybe hindsight that has forever afflicted the kenyan populace; we're hardly 7 months since the said cabinet ministers were setting their supporters against each other yet here comes Ngunyi asking that we trust them to act on it. I cannot begin to describe the disgust!!

    Posted  November 12, 2008 12:28 AM  
  2. Submitted by DoesNotHold

    Convenient,isn't it,how you're now taking the sovereignty high road and telling Kofi Annan to 'go back to Kumasi' after we literally forced him to stay in the country earlier this year until a peace agreement was reached.Your article has incensed me beyond anything else I've read this year.Not only do you disappoint in your lack of sensible thought,but you offer a 'solution' that could potentially hurt millions of Kenyans.Perhaps the 'hasn't he outlived his usefulness' question is one that we ought to be asking about you.

    Posted  October 27, 2008 04:08 PM  
  3. Submitted by DoesNotHold

    Mutahi,I generally have a fair amount of respect for your opinions,regardless of whether or not I agree with them.This article,however,crosses all lines...in whose pocket are you that you would propose such obscenely dangerous ideas?Hand over the report to the cabinet?Are you serious?The very same cabinet that consists of people whose names are said to be on this list?

    Posted  October 27, 2008 01:14 PM  
  4. Submitted by ngurekairu

    Mutahi, your article today is quite naive. Waki has hinted that some members of the 'cabinet' could have been involved thus the 'cabinet' can’t be objective in anything to do with the report. The only reason that someone can burn women and children marooned in a church is the comfort that they will never face the law. Just because we have goofed in the past on similar reports does not mean that we have to continue goofing. We can’t afford to loose 1,000 lives and billions every 5 years while escorting these 'gangsters' back to 'cabinet'.

    Posted  October 26, 2008 03:58 PM  
  5. Submitted by SJ502

    Who called for, ‘uncritical implementation of the Waki?’ There are recommendations for a tribunal or the Hague... and in there are due processes of law. What are you talking about casting doubts on Waki and Koffi’s competency? You talk of your involvement in failed peace missions all over Africa...well? What have you offered in your article to heal this nation: nothing.

    Posted  October 26, 2008 02:58 PM  

See all 9 comments