Opinion

Tanzania’s self-interest must not derail integration

  Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating
By TOM MSHINDI
Posted  Thursday, November 20  2008 at  18:57

IT IS A GOOD THING THAT in Zanzibar last week, Tanzania finally came clean on its opposition to the desire to fast-track East Africa’s regional integration.

Its position liberates the other four states from the burden of collegiality and allows them to pursue faster integration without the distraction of a partner that is clearly unwilling to commit to either a plan of action or key principles.

It is disappointing though that the southern neighbour cannot be trusted to act on decisions that have already been agreed on.

A frustrated Kenya’s minister for East African Community, Amason Jeffah Kingi, disclosed this week that Tanzania has decided to backtrack on decisions agreed by the Council of Ministers and now wants to renegotiate them.

Apparently, the Council of Ministers, a core committee that is the final forum for thrashing out issues before they are presented to the Summit (the committee of Presidents) for ratification, had met and agreed that identity cards can be used as travel documents within the region, that citizens of member states would be allowed to acquire land anywhere within the trading bloc, and that citizens of member countries be allowed to gain permanent residence in any country within the EAC.

ONCE THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS and the Summit have agreed on issues, technical committees are supposed to carry the process forward by getting into the details of implementation.

This is what the Zanzibar meeting was intended to do, only for the Tanzania delegation to demur and submit instead that the pace should be slower.

Remarkably, in the same week in Uganda, President Yoweri Museveni was calling for the application of a uniform fee charged on all East African students studying at Makerere University. This was after Kenyan students (who number close to 20,000) in Makerere, demonstrated against what they considered discriminatory fees charged on them.

Share This Story
Share

President Museveni is ready to lose some revenue in the short term to ensure that East Africans have access to the educational facilities in Uganda as its contribution to the integration process.

Of course the money will be recovered through increased admissions. The longer-term gain of inter-cultural bonding and knowledge-sharing across the borders is priceless.

In July, Rwanda’s President Paul Kagame announced in Kampala that professionals from Eastern African countries would not require work permits to take jobs in that country. It was a remarkable concession by a country that was yet to be officially inducted into the EAC.

Again, shorter term gains like work permit fees and protection of jobs for local professionals were being forsaken for longer term, high value gains — access to a wider variety of professionals, building regional work ethic and expertise, promoting inter-cultural interaction, and shattering the regressive pride of national exclusivity.

Kenya did weigh in with its own concession — to introduce a 24-hour working schedule at the critically important Mombasa port, and to reduce the number of roadblocks that held up trucks for days on end.

These relatively small gestures, when put together, underscore a commitment to the cause of integration that regrettably is not being manifested by Tanzania.

On the contrary, there are numerous tales of frustration and distress that Kenyan companies in particular have to put up with when seeking work permits for staff who work in Tanzania.

1 | 2 Next Page »

Add a comment (10 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by SJ502

    Tanzania is a drag. The idea of EA Partnership does not appeal to them. They have their own surplus labour; largely unskilled. They have a functioning port; that nobody wants. Their people can sneak in and out of Uganda, Zambia, Rwanda and Kenya anytime; why sign up EA? Also on their stubborness list, they believe, almost to the man, that Kenyans are thieves. Rwanda and Uganda do respect the potential of an EA partnership due to their special needs. Kenya should work with the willing neighbours. Kick out the proud. Life is a two-way street. Hail Tom Mshindi!

    Posted  November 21, 2008 07:28 PM  
  2. Submitted by Dom Mshindi

    Once beaten, twice shy. People criticizing TZ for their position on EAC should read some history of how the previous EA community ended in the 70s. But I am not saying Tanzania is doing the right thing, economically. There is an attitude issue here- how Tanzanians see kenyans- not very impressive. Ask Mutuma Mathiu and Mbogo Murage.

    Posted  November 21, 2008 06:50 PM  
  3. Submitted by iawe

    Perhaps the pro EAC countries should seriously consider shifting the EAC hq to Kigali i.e. in the event TZ decides to pull out as is the most likely scenario. It's called plan B.

    Posted  November 21, 2008 05:40 PM  
  4. Submitted by dweeb

    People, there are thousands of Kenyans in Tanzania, working and earning a living. Athi River recently anonounced investment in what will be the region largest cement plant, brokebond, KCB, and Transcentury all have significant investments. The first beneficiaries of any investment ought to be the local population, how then do kenyan companies justify hiring kenyans when there are Tanzanians who can perform? Mshindi your article lacks a balanced insight.

    Posted  November 21, 2008 04:20 PM  
  5. Submitted by kareggs

    Forget about Tanzania and start looking at the Congo to replace it

    Posted  November 21, 2008 11:30 AM  

See all 10 comments