Opinion

The Catholic Church should put its own house in order

  Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating
By BETTY CAPLAN
Posted  Thursday, March 26  2009 at  18:46

Pope Benedict XVI has now left the continent having preached to thousands in Angola and Cameroon. But doesn’t the epithet that “those who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones” apply to him?

Scientists have agreed that it was nothing short of irresponsible for him to claim that condom use actually increases the rate of HIV infection. It encourages promiscuity, the church believes.

This stance is immoral on two levels: first because it is plainly untrue, and goes against the advice of trained personnel. The church must recognise that it has failed in this mission.

SECONDLY, BECAUSE IT contradicts the kind of philosophy that has due regard for the health of our ailing planet. On the day the Pope arrived in Africa, the Nation featured a picture of dozens of beautiful children, all in the care of the police, their parents unwilling or unable to claim them.

The church fathers are stuck in a time warp; living in medieval times; they are totally out of touch, especially with youth.

Not only does the Vatican refuse to admit that its policies have not worked, but it will also not face the immorality which continues to fester in its own ranks.

Cases of sexual abuse of minors have been reported in countries as far apart as Australia and Mexico. The Pope himself suppressed publication of a report which revealed the extent of this exploitation.

In 2007, child sex abuse cases cost the church $615 million (Sh49 billion), an increase of 54 per cent over the previous year, most of which went towards settling in court. Therapy for the victims and the accused took care of $23 million.

Share This Story
Share

New allegations of abuse in 2007 totalled 689, most of the sufferers being young males between the ages of 10 and 14 when the abuse began.

A Charter for the Protection of Children has done better at protecting clergy from exposure.

In 2007, on his first visit to the USA, the Pope avoided Boston for fear of the protests about sex abuse scandals there.

The numbers of men in the West willing to repress their sexual needs and become priests has been decreasing rapidly; calls for the obligation to remain celibate have gone unheard.

But Africa, as in colonial times, is unfortunately ripe for conversion: only here is the church growing — an “opiate” as Marx called of desperately poor “masses” whose lives are made bearable by the unprovable belief that the next world is better than this one.

One cannot avoid the suspicion that underneath this pattern of behaviour is a fear and dislike of women who are particularly disadvantaged in the Catholic Church and prevented from holding high office.
Compare to the Anglican Church, which has tried hard to move with the times and accept homosexuals as being as worthy of love and respect as all men and women.

OR WITH HINDUS OR BUDDHISTS. The Catholic ideal is a Virgin, painted in centuries of European art as a (lily-white) maiden flying high in the clouds, well away from the grasp of men whereas she would have looked much more like an Arab or a Swahili.

1 | 2 Next Page »

Add a comment (6 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by mogofalo

    Maybe the pope should not be the enormous moral authority across the global culture that he is. The pope believes that a myth about the existence of a good one in Heaven at war with an evil one cast down to and ruling over Earth is; the truth about the existence of one totality that we all share. To claim that myth is truth as he does is to lie to the many of our global culture.

    Posted  March 28, 2009 01:00 AM  
  2. Submitted by gabbysteve

    The CATHOLIC CHURCH has already put her house in order by simply saying it's not advocating for use of condoms. This ought to be followed to the letter. You need not mix issues of individual priciples and doctrines of the church. Which came first, HIV or condom? Condom! Even before HIV, the music was the same, "stop use of condoms" This is not going to change as God is not going to change. Simply, those who are not married should wait to marry and those married already to have the obligation only with their partner (spouse only).

    Posted  March 27, 2009 06:55 PM  
  3. Submitted by Jellyfish

    Betty you are dead wrong. Did you see this article on the East African? "UNAIDS and myth of condoms efficacy against AIDS" posted on 7th of february 2009 by Curtis Abraham. http://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/news/-/2558/525956/-/rku48lz/-/index.html. To say that the scientific community is in agreement is disingeneous to say the least. If you need more scientific info on how ineffective condoms are I would be happy to furnish you with more.

    Posted  March 27, 2009 06:22 PM  
  4. Submitted by mzeengunga

    Betty is correct and I just hope that soon and soon enough the church will rise up to the challenge, face the problems of today with today's solutions. All churches, catholic and other christian faiths alike, have failed their flock and each should kneel to God and beg for forgivenss. If only the tenets of the church were followed to the letter HIV would not be finishing us this way. The pope should apologise and call on God for help!

    Posted  March 27, 2009 04:13 PM  
  5. Submitted by musyokaj

    Betty instead of singling out the Catholics, you may need to consider the fact that the whole of Christian doctrine is biased against women, contrary to the words and behaviour of its founder. And much more against the roots of the one-God belief as preached in the Torah, Bible and Quoran - Africa. We are not expected to think, feel or aspire. Mary is white, yet we know she had relatives in Africa. Note that the blood that Jesus shed on the cross is Mary's because spirits have no blood! Yet Mary is marginalized in the church.

    Posted  March 27, 2009 07:42 AM  

See all 6 comments