Opinion

Kibera: It’s rich city folks who need slums most

  Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating

 

By CHARLES ONYANGO-OBBO
Posted  Wednesday, July 8  2009 at  20:37

Without a shack in the slum that such people rent for Sh500 a month, they wouldn’t survive in the city.

Not everyone who lives in a slum ends up there. Some eventually move to the slightly better working class areas, and then to the suburbs.

They might join the police, army, or improve themselves slowly. But eventually, several make it.

Some of them get to be MPs and ministers, and one day one of these people who started out in a slum could become president.

Some of the women (a friend swears that Nairobi’s most beautiful are to be found in the slums) usually get married to powerful men, or get by as pampered mistresses.

However, if you look thoughtfully at the slums from the leafy suburbs and central business district, the story begins to change.

There are slums because cities in poor Third World countries can’t survive without them.

Take the watchman who is paid Sh5,000. At that low wage, the middle class can afford to hire a watchman for day and another for night.

Share This Story
Share

If there were no slums, and the cheapest accommodation a watchman could find was Sh5,000 a month, and all his other expenses were up accordingly, then the lowest a watchman or househelp (housegirl, to use the politically incorrect word) would be paid is Sh50,000.

At that wage, the middle class wouldn’t afford watchmen, househelps and nannies for their children.

Slums, therefore, are vehicles through which the urban poor subsidise its middle class.

For that reason, it’s the height of hypocrisy when the middle class moralise about how terrible things are in the slums.

In Kenya’s case, slums — all their risks notwithstanding — are actually a stabilising force.

The pressures created by the great land dispossession in Kenya by the colonialists, which continued after independence, were partly soaked up by Nairobi’s slums.

Nairobi is unique in that it’s the one African city that is ringed on all sides by slums and shanty cities — Kibera, Mathare, Kawangware, Mukuru, Kibagare, Kangemi, and Dandora.

« Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 Next Page »

Add a comment (35 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by wahinya michael

    What have the goverment done to improve the slums which are represented by members of parliament.Where does the money go allocated to that constituency.Leaders must be held accountable.The people who live in slums have no choice as they are factory workers who are poorly paid or work else where earning 100/= a day.What can you by with 500 shillings today?Yet the MPs continue to raise their salaries and have forgotten other people in slums.

    Posted  July 12, 2009 01:33 AM  
  2. Submitted by Moorni

    Obbo and a bout other east african c

    Posted  July 11, 2009 05:52 PM  
  3. Submitted by muthinja1

    coldcase, you are mediocre itself here. Mr. Obbo is right, without the need for cheap (call it oppresive) labor, slums would have no place near or in any city. Yes, it is the rich and middle class who benefit from the poverty and awful living conditions of the slumdwellers. And, they will go to any lengths to keep them there; look at the meagre wages they pay to ensure they never rise! call it a necessary evil, but remember the evil side is the rich.

    Posted  July 11, 2009 04:06 PM  
  4. Submitted by rmuchira

    something worth thinking about. I have to admit I have never looked at it this way. This makes a quite interesting perspective.

    Posted  July 11, 2009 01:48 PM  
  5. Submitted by mabawa

    This article has a stench similar to the slums ....takataka kabisa

    Posted  July 11, 2009 09:25 AM  

See all 35 comments