Opinion

Why Kenya should not have signed the Rome Treaties

  Share Bookmark Print Email
Email this article to a friend

Submit Cancel
Rating
By WILLIAM OCHIENG
Posted  Monday, November 23  2009 at  17:10

RIGHT FROM THE BEGINNING, I was very unhappy that Kenya had signed the Rome treaty that seemed to reverse our independence into a corner controlled by the imperialists.

The ICC may have its benefits, but very often, very sweet things have tragic coatings, just like from sex you sometimes end up with gonorrhoea.

Had the ICC been an African union outfit, I would not have minded. Despite our institutional weakness – including our judicial weakness – the only way to strengthen them is to reform them, and to get on with them.

We cannot claim to be independent while we keep running back to the imperialists for help.

For the last one full year, Luis Moreno-Ocampo’s mythology has dominated our news and discourse. His alleged power and sagacity have turned him into an ethereal colossus. But as a lawyer he is no better than our Amos Wako, or our indomitable Gitobu Imanyara.

AND NOW THAT OCAMPO HAS VISITED us and gone, let us instruct our Attorney-General to write to him a polite letter instructing him not to return.

I also sincerely believe that we cannot run our governance through armed conflict. All those who organised and funded the post-election violence must be heavily punished. An eye for an eye still remains good retribution. But we do not need Moreno-Ocampo to try our criminals.

Let us set up one side of our High Court, chaired by Charles Njonjo, to try these felonious vagabonds.

Share This Story
Share

I agree with Egyptian Ambassador to Kenya, Mr Saher Hamzer, who advised that the perpetrators of the mayhem be tried at home, because ‘‘Kenya is capable of solving its own problems.”

Unfortunately there are still many people in Kenya who nostalgically yearn for European things, and would prefer if our problems were sorted out by Europeans. I am not preaching anti-Westernism. I have many, many, British and American friends. But that is a different issue. We must separate personal interests from state interests.

Indeed, soon after independence, Jomo Kenyatta taught us to “forget and forgive” the imperialists, and to get on with building a strong and independent republic, and that is why retired President Moi is clear that it was a mistake to have involved the ICC participation in our national predicament.

Now and again, in the past, we had workshops on “The Kenya We Want.” Part of the answer to that need is being tackled by the various reform commissions we have appointed.

What, however, is disturbing is the death of the nationalist fervour that we all shared.

Being strongly Kenyan does not stop us from being internationalist. But it helps us together to take binding and brotherly decisions. It also helps us at crucial moments, to put our class and ethnic differences aside in order to tackle national problems together.

As a nation, we must genuinely begin to isolate those who keep championing tribalist interests. There are those selfish leaders who thrive on tribalism, but whose electors do not get any better economically.

1 | 2 Next Page »

Add a comment (7 comments so far)

  1. Submitted by jelnam

    so bwana kamau pray tell what is the substance that comes from the Western European and what has that anything to do with strengthening national institutions? Even if W Ochieng has never been the most objective academic, he makes perfect sense in urging for strengthening of domestic institutions and moving on from the Ocampo preoccupation. By the way, since its inception in 2001, how many trials has the ICC successfully concluded?

    Posted  November 24, 2009 08:15 PM  
  2. Submitted by kamaujm

    My UK lecturer writes substance and he is western European for your record! Woe unto those who are taught by this bigoted professor. Had I forgotten that William Ochieng belongs to the yester Kanu think tank with my old professor Mwanzi! God bless those poor kids who are taught by the likes of Ochieng and Mwanzi!

    Posted  November 24, 2009 05:36 PM  
  3. Submitted by werssylwer

    This guy is a teacher? Unbelievable! To him Obama is not impearilistic but Ocampo is. Oh my word!! A teacher? U must be kidding me. Ocampo is more important to Kenya right now than this " taecher" knows. Graciouse me, this is unbelievable!!!

    Posted  November 24, 2009 08:19 AM  
  4. Submitted by okamala

    I totally disagree with you. ICC,UNHCR and other international body protocols were designed for the common good of all persons. ICC was not formed to target Africa, and ICC only comes in when the internal organs don't seem willing or have failed to act. I don't bwana Ochieng, if you were a victim or lost doring th PEV, you would still have wrotten this article

    Posted  November 24, 2009 08:00 AM  
  5. Submitted by psaisi

    Prof Ochieng, I wish I had enough space to rebuttal your views. If someone had given you death and gonorrhea which one will you go for? ICC is there to deter those who want to kill in order to rule. It is better to loose something in return for discouraging impunity. "Binding and brotherly decisions" you have mentioned has failed many times even 2007. It was International community ( you refer to as imperialists) that saved our country. Think about that!

    Posted  November 24, 2009 07:22 AM  

See all 7 comments