Corruption starts from the budgetary process

Monday March 7 2016

Treasury Cabinet Secretary Henry Rotich at the Treasury building on June 13, 2013, before he read the budget for financial year 2013-2014. PHOTO | NATION MEDIA GROUP

Treasury Cabinet Secretary Henry Rotich at the Treasury building on June 13, 2013, before he read the budget for financial year 2013-2014. PHOTO | NATION MEDIA GROUP 


“Never had I heard the words budget padding” said President Muhamadou Buhari of Nigeria last month following fraudulent padding of the costs of budgeted items and wholesale injection of questionable line items into the budget between when he approved it and when he delivered it.

As President Buhari was busy poking past alleged looters of public funds out of their holes, a budget mafia were busy padding out his budget with billions of naira, which he knew nothing about. He later fired the Head of the Budget Office.

Padding the budget means making the budget proposal larger than the actual estimates. This is done by increasing expenses so as to be granted approval for an artificially high level of funding for the proposed projects. Some sort of irresponsible foresight where for example public officers will budget to buy biro pens at Sh7000.

What Buhari faced in his first budget is the norm here in Kenya. Corruption in our public sector starts from the budgetary process. Today, much of the graft occurs through the budget process. Both executive and legislature blatantly allocate public money for themselves, brokers or preferred businesses through various machinations that they do with the budget.

The budgeting cycle generally has four key phases namely; formulation, adoption, execution and control. The first two are “ex-ante” (before approval of parliament). The last two are “ex-post” (after approval of parliament). Although the formulation and adoption stages do not deal with actual money flows, these budget preparation stages are key parts of a corruption process that manifests itself only in the actual payments or transfer of money at the execution stage.

It all starts at these Kutenga stages although the ‘eating’ occurs at the Kutender stage. It is where fraudulent and frivolous allocations, many of which are clearly meant to be reaped in the later stages of the budgeting process are sown. Some of the allocations are either repeated several times, over-priced or are vendor-driven obvious misplacement of priorities. It is at this initial stages that graft and corruption is planned and budgeted for.

Then comes the next stage or the adoption stage. The budget committee and parliament in general comes on board after almost a year of deliberations between the budget mafia in the line ministries, brokers and vendors. Using its oversight rights, parliament is in theory expected to expose any corruption that took place at the formulation stage.

But in practice, the adoption stage is where parliament becomes part of the problem rather than the solution in the budgeting process in as far as fighting corruption is concerned. It is at this stage of the process that the hyenas park; ready to join the gravy train.

The constitution has given parliament the ability to amend the national budget. Unfortunately, our MPs have used this to influence public policy to provide themselves with private benefits meaning more corruption is added at this stage than is detected. As we speak, parliament does not have a budget committee because the house last month refused to approve the members of the committee.


The committee was accused of allocating each of the 51 members millions of shillings to undertake various projects in their respective constituencies in the previous budgets. In any modern democracy, the legislature, civil society and media are expected to play oversight functions in addition to the internal control system put in place by the executive. Unfortunately these institutions and mechanisms for oversight of the budgetary process are themselves caught in the corruption web.

The execution stage, the first of the two ex-ante stages, is merely where corruption gets transmogrified into outright looting of the public treasury. It is at this stage where what has been cooking gets ‘eaten’ via the Kutender process.

By this stage, corruption in the budget has been legalised and there is hardly anything one can do to stop the procurement of the pens for Ksh 7000. It is within the budget they would say, even when the numbers seem uncouth!

In the last stage; the control stage, the deed is done. The Office of the Auditor General merely reports what has happened. We learn at this stage of the budget, like we are about to do for the Financial Year 2014/15, about the billions that have disappeared into the black hole of greed and corruption. We accept and move on and planning for corruption for the following year begins. A viscous cycle!

President Uhuru Kenyatta recently acknowledge the problem of corruption in the budgeting process and proposed the formation of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) at the Presidency.

OMB is not yet in place even after the President announced the timelines. There are many problems affecting the budgetary process. The administration should move quickly and set up OMB so that the President can personally take charge of a significant part of the budgeting process.

The administration must also go beyond the formation of OMB and implement a comprehensive budgetary reform. If we want to deal with corruption and wastage of public funds, we must ensure all stages of our budgeting process is insulated from corruption.

The budget has become an instrument of the corruption process in this country. If the Uhuru administration and the anti-corruption watchdog do not succeed in stopping that process, then the anti-corruption war will be completely futile.

Mohamed Wehliye is Senior Vice President, Financial Risk Management, Riyad Bank, Saudi Arabia