Opinion
Let’s face it, Uhuru and Muthaura didn’t resign
Posted Saturday, January 28 2012 at 19:47
Let’s first get the basic facts right. Neither Finance Minister Uhuru Kenyatta, nor Head of Civil Service Francis Muthaura, has resigned from their offices.
They have rather “stepped aside”. “Stepping aside” is an oxymoron not known to Kenyan law.
Legally, both gentlemen are still the “substantive holders” of their offices.
Nor should anyone be fooled by President Mwai Kibaki’s appointment of Nairobi Metropolitan Minister Robinson Githae as “acting” Finance Minister and Internal Security PS Francis Kimemia as “acting” Head of Civil Service and Secretary to the Cabinet.
Substitution not disqualification
In football, President Kibaki has simply “substituted” Mr Githae for Mr Kenyatta and Mr Kimemia for Mr Muthaura.
Mr Kenyatta and Mr Muthaura can “still play” because a “substitution” isn’t a “disqualification”.
Mr Kenyatta and Mr Muthaura have supposedly been shown the “yellow card” and not the “red card”.
But, in fact, Mr Kenyatta’s card isn’t even “yellow”. Mr Kenyatta is still the sitting Deputy Prime Minister to whom Mr Githae, the “acting” Finance minister, will report.
Effectively, this means that Mr Githae will be nothing but Mr Kenyatta’s puppet. Semantics aside, Mr Kenyatta is still in charge.
Which begs the question: What’s Mr Kenyatta’s logic in “stepping aside” as Finance minister while stubbornly squatting in the Deputy Prime Minister’s office?
Isn’t that what we call a “distinction without a difference?”
Doesn’t Mr Kenyatta’s circumlocutous thinking utterly defy the logic and the essence of “resigning” from public office?
It’s an open secret that President Kibaki trusts Mr Muthaura and Mr Kenyatta more than any other two officials in the government.
You can also take this to the bank – I believe that Mr Kenyatta is Mr Kibaki’s preferred successor at State House.
-
Submitted by nelnje99Posted January 31, 2012 06:59 PM
-
Submitted by diblolion
While Kenya Airways is the Pride of Africa, Kenyan politicians are the laughing stock of East Africa. Even if the ICC was not there, they would still be wrangling and forming unnecessary alliances.
Posted January 31, 2012 10:31 AM -
Submitted by alfotula
@ Ngaii, you are living in the past. Pls wake up to the dispensation of the brand new katiba. By the way, WR and UK were very instrumental in the drafting of the new katiba in Naivasha. When they thought they had cornered RAO, he surprised them by backing the draft. Then these two changed tune. They wanted local triburnal, when RAO supported that position, they changed tune. Now they are blaming him for the Hague. And some of us are suckere to all these.
Posted January 31, 2012 04:59 AM -
Submitted by otishotish
To NjuruJulius: Come back to Kenya? After seeing electoral disputes "settled" by rape, chopping by panga, being burnt alive, peniis-cutting with broken bottle, mass displacement? I think the professor is very wise to stick to "reform by remote".
Posted January 30, 2012 09:08 PM -
Submitted by rohojuu
Down with impunity! If the Law allows them to run for public office, so be it. Logistics for a fair election should be put in place and surprises will be in plenty.
Posted January 30, 2012 07:26 PM




RSS
Mutua is desperate to convince Kenyans with his irrelevant partisan political opinions.