Entebbe raid changed East African wars and politics

From left: Eyal Oren, Shlomo Carmel, Jaffer Amin, Amjon Peled, Alex Davidi, unidentified, and Amir Ofer, members of the former Israeli Commandos and Entebbe hostages pose in Kampala, Uganda on June 14, 2016 ahead of the 40th anniversary of their rescue on July , 2016. PHOTO | RONALD KABUUBI | AFP

What you need to know:

  • The Entebbe raid came at a time when Ugandan dictator Idi Amin seemed to have put down or survived all attempts to oust or assassinate him, and the long-suffering country was in despair, its economy in ruins.
  • It exposed Amin as a paper tiger, and had the effect of emboldening his enemies, including Uganda’s exiled dissidents.
  • But perhaps the biggest blow geopolitically was that it exposed as a lie the idea, popular then, that there was deep solidarity between the Middle East Muslim states and Amin that helped keep him in power.

July 4 was the 40th anniversary of the Entebbe raid, in which Israeli commandos rescued majority Israeli hostages aboard an Air France plane that terrorists had hijacked and landed in Uganda.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, on his first Africa visit to Africa, attended the commemoration in Uganda on Monday.

Netanyahu’s brother, Yonatan Netanyahu, was the officer who commanded the Entebbe rescue, and the only Israeli soldier who was killed in the July 4, 1976 raid.

Though films and conversation on the Entebbe raid tend to focus on the military heroics, it had far-reaching consequences that are often missed in the region.

The Entebbe raid came at a time when Ugandan dictator Idi Amin seemed to have put down or survived all attempts to oust or assassinate him, and the long-suffering country was in despair, its economy in ruins.

It exposed Amin as a paper tiger, and had the effect of emboldening his enemies, including Uganda’s exiled dissidents.

But perhaps the biggest blow geopolitically was that it exposed as a lie the idea, popular then, that there was deep solidarity between the Middle East Muslim states and Amin that helped keep him in power.

In that period with the Entebbe hostages the biggest international story, it was puzzling that a military transporter would leave Israel for East Africa and Arab intelligence services didn’t get a whiff of it.

If they didn’t, then they were woefully incompetent, a fact Israel would have noted with delight. If they did, then they betrayed their ally Amin, by not tipping him off.

Even if the Israeli mission hadn’t been tracked inward, certainly from Kenya where it stopped to refuel—and Amin reputedly had his intelligence network active—it should have. It wasn’t.

It all worked to expose a then-isolated Amin regime weakness.

Aware that indeed he was now vulnerable, Amin moved to invade Kenya, which had collaborated with the Israelis.

Kenya had always had a different position on Idi than Tanzania, where ousted Milton Obote was living in exile.

Its policy was highly influenced by the magendo (smuggling) mafia who were profiting immensely from the Ugandan trade and smuggling its coffee.

The Amin threat on Kenya, is thought to have forced influential elements in Nairobi to give more wiggle to anti-Amin exiles in the country, and to warm up to Tanzania, with which it was having a regional cold war, on the issue of Amin.

That in turn enabled Uganda exile groups in Tanzania and Kenya to collaborate in ways they couldn’t before the Entebbe raid.

That Amin was caught out revealed sharply that he and his lieutenants just didn’t have an asymmetrical security mindset. In addition, the Israelis razed his air force that, at that point, was thought to be the most formidable in the region.

After his stand-off with Kenya eventually fizzled, Amin invaded eastern Tanzania in late 1978, again to show he was no walkover after the Entebbe humiliation.

Big mistake. Amin must have expected the Tanzanians to hit back. However, they didn’t do it the way he expected. Having learnt that Amin was a linear thinker from the Entebbe raid, they did two things different. First, they didn’t hit back at him alone. They came with Ugandan rebel groups, making it hard for him to rally patriotic fervour against a foreign invader.

Then, secondly, the Tanzanians didn’t drive in on trucks and armoured cars. From the Tanzania-Uganda border, they actually mostly walked all the way to Kampala.

With a large part of his airforce destroyed in the 1976 raid, Amin couldn’t harass the walking Tanzanians and Ugandan dissidents from the air much.

And because they were on foot, they could veer off the highways and along the bushes, again outfoxing Amin as they left his heavily mechanised battalions—the centrepiece of his military strategy—on the roads with no one to fight.

When they did follow them off the main roads, they confronted their foes on ground they couldn’t fight on. They were hammered.

People like Museveni and his Fronasa rebels took the lessons to heart and mastered the asymmetrical game.

They later walked the war against Obote, and as an offshoot, the Rwandans walked theirs too—and then did the same against Zaire's President Mobutu Sese Seko. That’s the short of it.

Charles Onyango-Obbo is publisher, Africapedia and Roguechiefs.

Twitter: @cobbo3