Blatter v Ali for Fifa job as Figo, van Praag exit

What you need to know:

  • Former Portugal captain Figo withdrew with a bitter broadside at the contentious election campaign which will culminate in a vote on May 29 where Blatter is widely expected to hang on to a post he has held since 1998.
  • Observers say Prince Ali stands the best chance to unseat Blatter because the Jordanian had a better campaign budget and contacts within Fifa, having served on its executive committee since 2011.
  • Figo used his Facebook announcement to also condemn what he believes are double-standards in football’s global ruling bodies.

Luis Figo and Michael van Praag pulled out of the race for the Fifa presidency Thursday, leaving controversial incumbent Sepp Blatter in a straight fight with Jordan’s Prince Ali bin al Hussein.

Former Portugal captain Figo withdrew with a bitter broadside at the contentious election campaign which will culminate in a vote on May 29 where Blatter is widely expected to hang on to a post he has held since 1998.

“I do not fear the ballot box, but I will not go along with nor will I give my consent to a process which will end on May 29 and from which soccer will not emerge the winner,” Figo wrote on his Facebook page.

“My decision is made, I will not stand in what is being called an election for the Fifa presidency.”

Dutch Fifa presidential candidate van Praag also announced he was dropping his bid, saying he will back Prince Ali instead.

Van Praag, a former Ajax chairman announced his candidacy in January, saying he wanted to modernise the world governing body “which has lost all credibility.”

Fifa had become ridden with suspicion, conflicts of interest and allegations of nepotism and corruption, he said at the time.

Observers say Prince Ali stands the best chance to unseat Blatter because the Jordanian had a better campaign budget and contacts within Fifa, having served on its executive committee since 2011.

Figo used his Facebook announcement to also condemn what he believes are double-standards in football’s global ruling bodies.

“I have seen with my own eyes federation presidents who, after one day comparing Fifa leaders to the devil, then go on stage and compare those same people with Jesus Christ. Nobody told me about this. I saw it with my own eyes,” he wrote. “The candidates were prevented from addressing federations at congresses while one of the candidates always gave speeches on his own from the rostrum.

“Does anyone think it’s normal that an election for one of the most relevant organisations on the planet can go ahead without a public debate? Does anyone think it’s normal that one of the candidates doesn’t even bother to present an election manifesto that can be voted on May 29? Shouldn’t it be mandatory?”